共 24 条
Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
被引:39
作者:
Zhu, Changyu
[1
]
Guan, Jianmei
[2
]
Xiao, Hua
[3
,4
]
Luo, Weinan
[3
,4
]
Tong, Rongsheng
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Acad Med Sci & Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Personalized Drug Therapy Key Lab Sichuan Prov, 32,West Sect 2,1st Ring Rd, Chengdu 610072, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
chronic migraine;
episodic migraine;
erenumab;
meta-analysis;
RCTs;
EPISODIC MIGRAINE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
PREVENTIVE TREATMENT;
AMG;
334;
HEALTHY;
HUMANS;
D O I:
10.1097/MD.0000000000018483
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Erenumab is a new medicine recently approved in the United States of America for the preventive treatment of migraine among adults. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of erenumab among patients with migraine. Methods: The electronic databases that were searched comprised PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library, which were independently retrieved by 2 reviewers. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared placebo with erenumab were selected. Mean differences (MDs), pooled risk ratios (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively. Results: Five RCTs representing 2928 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed significant reductions in the 50% responder rate (RR 1.55; P < .00001; I-2 =49%). In addition, the mean monthly migraine days from baseline in the erenumab group compared with placebo (MD-1.32; P < .00001; I-2 =100%) and migraine-specific medication days) from baseline (MD-1.41; P < .00001; I-2 = 100%) were significantly decreased for the erenumab group as compared with placebo. Furthermore, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline in the 140 mg erenumab group were significantly reduced as compared the 70 mg group (MD = 0.55; P < .00001; I-2 = 90%). Finally, there was no significant difference between the erenumab group and placebo for any adverse event and serious adverse event. Conclusion: Among patients with migraine, both 70 and 140 mg of erenumab were associated with reduced Migraine-specific medication days, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline, and an increased rate of a 50% reduction, in the absence of an increased risk of any serious adverse effect.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文