Response of lithium formate EPR dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy

被引:26
作者
Adolfsson, Emelie [1 ]
Carlsson, Gudrun Alm [1 ]
Grindborg, Jan-Erik [2 ]
Gustafsson, Hakan [1 ]
Lund, Eva [1 ]
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci IMH, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Swedish Radiat Safety Author, SE-17116 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
lithium formate EPR; brachytherapy; dosimetry; detector response; kV x rays; HDR BRACHYTHERAPY; DOSE MEASUREMENTS; IR-192; SOURCE; X-RAYS; DETECTOR; SPECTRA; TLD; VERIFICATION; PROTOCOL; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1118/1.3475938
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate experimentally the energy dependence of the detector response of lithium formate EPR dosimeters for photon energies below 1 MeV relative to that at Co-60 energies. High energy photon beams are used in calibrating dosimeters for use in brachytherapy since the absorbed dose to water can be determined with high accuracy in such beams using calibrated ion chambers and standard dosimetry protocols. In addition to any differences in mass-energy absorption properties between water and detector, variations in radiation yield (detector response) with radiation quality, caused by differences in the density of ionization in the energy imparted (LET), may exist. Knowledge of an eventual deviation in detector response with photon energy is important for attaining high accuracy in measured brachytherapy dose distributions. Methods: Lithium formate EPR dosimeters were irradiated to known levels of air kerma in 25-250 kV x-ray beams and in Cs-137 and Co-60 beams at the Swedish Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratory. Conversions from air kerma free in air into values of mean absorbed dose to the detectors were made using EGSnrc MC simulations and x-ray energy spectra measured or calculated for the actual beams. The signals from the detectors were measured using EPR spectrometry. Detector response (the EPR signal per mean absorbed dose to the detector) relative to that for Co-60 was determined for each beam quality. Results: Significant decreases in the relative response ranging from 5% to 6% were seen for x-ray beams at tube voltages <= 180 kV. No significant reduction in the relative response was seen for Cs-137 and 250 kV x rays. Conclusions: When calibrated in Co-60 or MV photon beams, corrections for the photon energy dependence of detector response are needed to achieve the highest accuracy when using lithium formate EPR dosimeters for measuring absorbed doses around brachytherapy sources emitting photons in the energy range of 20-150 keV such as 169Yb and electronic sources. c 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3475938]
引用
收藏
页码:4946 / 4959
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ADOLFSSON G, 2009, WORLD C MED PHYS BIO, P236
[2]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[3]   Characterization of a fiber-coupled Al2O3:C luminescence dosimetry system for online in vivo dose verification during 192Ir brachytherapy [J].
Andersen, Claus E. ;
Nielsen, Soren Kynde ;
Greilich, Steffen ;
Helt-Hansen, Jakob ;
Lindegaard, Jacob Christian ;
Tanderup, Kari .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (03) :708-718
[4]  
Andreo P, 2000, IAEA TECHNICAL REPOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PIRS701 NRCC
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[7]   In vivo dosimetry in the urethra using alanine/ESR during 192Ir HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer-a phantom study [J].
Anton, Mathias ;
Wagner, Daniela ;
Selbach, Hans-Joachim ;
Hackel, Thomas ;
Hermann, Robert Michael ;
Hess, Clemens Friedrich ;
Vorwerk, Hilke .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (09) :2915-2931
[8]   Evaluation of a lithium formate EPR dosimetry system for dose measurements around 192Ir brachytherapy sources [J].
Antonovic, Laura ;
Gustafsson, Hakan ;
Carlsson, Gudrun Alm ;
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :2236-2247
[9]  
Berger M., NIST, PML, DOI [10.18434/T48G6X, DOI 10.18434/T48G6X]
[10]  
Berger M. J., 2010, ESTAR PSTAR ASTAR CO