Looking Backward but Moving Forward Honoring the Sacred and Asserting the Sovereign in Indigenous Evaluation

被引:31
作者
Bowman-Farrell, Nicole R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Wisconsin Ctr Educ Res, Madison, WI USA
[2] Bowman Performance Consulting, Shawano, WI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
evaluation; evaluation theory; evaluation methods; evaluation use; systems evaluation; racial framing; racism; culturally responsive evaluation; culturally responsive indigenous evaluation; government evaluation; indigenous; tribal government; American Indian; Native American; HISTORICAL TRAUMA; AMERICAN; PERSISTENCE; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1177/1098214018790412
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Culturally responsive evaluation and culturally responsive Indigenous evaluation (CRIE) within the broader field of evaluation are not often included in Western literature nor are they known or used by the majority of mainstream evaluators. In order to address this literature and practice gap, this article offers an overview and a broader origin story of CRIE prior to colonial or European contact in the United States and gives an overview of the historical, theoretical, and practical foundations for conducting CRIE in a contemporary evaluation context. Examples of evidence-based models, theories, and resources are provided to connect CRIE to Western evaluation designs and provide concrete strategies for the field of evaluation going forward. The article concludes with systemic and policy evaluation considerations as agencies from federal (i.e., United States), tribal, and international governments and partners from private or nonprofit sectors collaborate to carry out Indigenous evaluations in the future. Collectively this multijurisdictional, culturally responsive, and community-centered CRIE approach gives evaluators a new way to move forward.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 568
页数:26
相关论文
共 112 条
[81]  
Kirkhart K.E., 2005, ROLE CULTURE CULTURA, P21
[82]   Eyes on the Prize: Multicultural Validity and Evaluation Theory [J].
Kirkhart, Karen E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2010, 31 (03) :400-413
[83]  
Kukutai T., 2016, Indigenous data sovereignty: towards an agenda, DOI 10.1109/IPDPSW.2014.214
[84]  
LaFrance J., 2010, CAN J PROGRAM EVAL, V23, P13, DOI [10.3138/cjpe.23.003, DOI 10.3138/CJPE.23.003]
[85]  
Lederle JohnW., 1949, Marquette Law Review, V33, P89
[86]  
Letendre A., 2004, PIMATISIWIN J ABORIG, V2, P1
[87]  
Lyons O., 1998, Exiled in the land of the free: Democracy
[88]  
Mackety D.M., 2012, COMMUNITY BASED PART
[89]  
Mariella P., 2009, Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, V3, P41
[90]   RABIES DIAGNOSIS BY FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY .1. ITS EVALUATION IN A PUBLIC-HEALTH LABORATORY [J].
MCQUEEN, JL ;
LEWIS, AL ;
SCHNEIDER, NJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE NATIONS HEALTH, 1960, 50 (11) :1743-1752