Sexual Abuse Prevention Programme Fidelity: Video Analysis of Interactions

被引:6
作者
Barron, Ian G. [1 ]
Topping, Keith J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Educ Social Work & Community Educ, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
关键词
implementation integrity; fidelity; evaluation; video interaction analysis; sexual abuse programme; HEALTH TEACHING MODULES; IMPLEMENTATION; CHILD; INTEGRITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/car.1134
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This paper identifies key themes from research into programme fidelity of sexual abuse prevention programmes. It presents a detailed analysis of programme fidelity within a study of the Tweenees school-based abuse prevention programme (Barron and Topping, 2010). The paper reports how programme fidelity was addressed in a programme delivered to survivors of child sexual abuse by experienced survivor organisation workers. There was also study of programme fidelity in the delivery of the programme to grade-seven pupils through co-working between survivor organisation workers and teachers. Video was taken of all four sessions delivered to the survivors' group. To begin to explore programme fidelity when lessons were co-delivered by survivor organisation workers and a teacher, the first session of a grade-seven class was videoed. Survivor organisation workers achieved high levels of programme fidelity characterised by facilitative communicative behaviours (e.g. affirming responses, seeking clarification, checking understanding and summarising). The grade-seven teacher's communication was characterised by a behaviour management focus. Video analysis of interactions was a useful measure for programme fidelity and analysing appropriate communication underpinning delivery of the programme. Recommendations for future programme fidelity measures are provided for researchers and practitioners in the field. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 151
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of programme integrity [J].
Andrews, DA ;
Dowden, C .
LEGAL AND CRIMINOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 10 :173-187
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, EVALUATION MANAGEMEN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DIFFUSIONS INNOVATIO
[4]  
BARRON I, 2010, EVALUATION EFFECTIVE
[5]  
Bond L.A., 2004, Journal of Primary Prevention, V24, P199, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:J0PP.0000018051.90165.65, 10.1023/b:jopp.0000018051.90165, DOI 10.1023/B:JOPP.0000018051.90165, 10.1023/B:JOPP.0000018051.90165.65]
[6]   Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control [J].
Dane, AV ;
Schneider, BH .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 18 (01) :23-45
[7]  
Dobson D., 1980, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V3, P269, DOI DOI 10.1016/0149-7189(80)90042-7
[8]   The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs that prevent mental disorders in school-aged children [J].
Domitrovich, CE ;
Greenberg, MT .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTATION, 2000, 11 (02) :193-221
[9]  
Durlak J.A., 1998, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATI
[10]  
Durlak JA., 1997, Successful prevention programs for children and adolescents