False Positive test Results for Pheochromocytoma from 2000 to 2008

被引:46
|
作者
Yu, R. [1 ]
Wei, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Endocrinol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Care Fdn, Beverly Hills, CA USA
关键词
pheochromocytoma; laboratory tests; false positive results; PLASMA NOREPINEPHRINE CONCENTRATIONS; OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; BIOCHEMICAL-DIAGNOSIS; METANEPHRINES; CATECHOLAMINES; HYPERTENSION; MASS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1237699
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Testing for pheochromocytoma becomes more frequent in clinical practice. False positive test results may cause patient anxiety and unnecessary imaging studies. The data on false positive results for pheochromocytoma in routine clinical practice are lacking. To examine the prevalence of false positive results and to reveal the clinical features and laboratory tests of patients with markedly elevated but false positive test results, a database of tests for pheochromocytoma at a large general hospital between 2000 and 2008 was reviewed. Of 1 896 patients tested, 417 (22.0%) had at least one abnormal test result and 66 (3.5%) had markedly elevated results. 24 patients with markedly elevated but false positive results received 65 imaging studies and 1 adrenalectomy. The causes of the misleading results included physiological variations (33%), laboratory errors (29%), and drug interference with measurement (21%). The false positive rate of a markedly elevated result was lowest for vanillylmandelic acid (9%) and highest for urine metanephrines (50%) (p = 0.03). Nearly half of all test results were normal and 79% of patients had at least one normal result. Therefore false positive test results for pheochromocytoma are rather common. Markedly elevated but false positive test results can potentially be avoided by judicious selection of patients and tests. Pretest risk, physiological variations of catecholamine levels, laboratory errors, and drug interference should be considered in interpreting abnormal test results.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 585
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: How to distinguish true- from false-positive test results
    Eisenhofer, G
    Goldstein, DS
    Walther, MM
    Friberg, P
    Lenders, JWM
    Keiser, HR
    Pacak, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2003, 88 (06): : 2656 - 2666
  • [2] FALSE POSITIVE REACTION TO THE PIPEROXAN HYDROCHLORIDE TEST FOR PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA
    SOFFER, A
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1952, 148 (07): : 538 - 541
  • [3] FALSE-POSITIVE TEST FOR PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA WITH AN ADRENOLYTIC COMPOUND
    MEILMAN, E
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1951, 245 (05): : 177 - 179
  • [4] ETHAMBUTOL AND A FALSE-POSITIVE SCREENING-TEST FOR PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA
    GABRIEL, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 3 (5822): : 332 - &
  • [5] The dangers of false-positive and false-negative test results: False-positive results as a function
    Jackson, Brian R.
    CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 28 (02) : 305 - +
  • [7] False-positive results for pheochromocytoma associated with norepinephrine reuptake blockade
    Schuerfeld, Robin
    Pamporaki, Christina
    Peitzsch, Mirko
    Rayes, Nada
    Sabri, Osama
    Rohm, Silvio
    Biemann, Ronald
    Sandner, Benjamin
    Toenjes, Anke
    Eisenhofer, Graeme
    ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2024, 31 (01)
  • [8] False positive tuberculosis skin test results
    Grabau, JC
    DiFerdinando, GT
    Novick, LF
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 1995, 110 (06) : 703 - 706
  • [9] FALSE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE RESULTS IN ALLEN TEST
    HIRAI, M
    KAWAI, S
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1980, 21 (03): : 353 - 360
  • [10] False positive results for the AUSZYME monoclonal test
    Sheffield, JS
    Laibl, VR
    Roberts, SW
    Wendel, GD
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (02): : 449 - 450