OK-shell photoemission of the CO molecule: comparison between theory and experiment

被引:5
|
作者
Cherepkov, NA [1 ]
Semenov, SK
Golovin, AV
Adachi, J
Yagishita, A
机构
[1] State Univ Aerosp Instrumentat, St Petersburg 190000, Russia
[2] St Petersburg State Univ, St Petersburg 198504, Russia
[3] Inst Mat Struct Sci, Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050801, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0953-4075/37/24/007
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Photoionization cross sections, dipole matrix elements and phase shifts are calculated for the O K-shell of the CO molecule using two theoretical models. One of them is a new version of the relaxed core Hartree-Fock approximation with a fractional charge. The value of this charge is considered as a fitting parameter. In this paper, the fractional charge 0.7 was used which gives a correct position of the maximum of the sigma* shape resonance in the photoionization cross section. The other model is a modification of the multiple scattering method with overlapping atomic spheres. The dipole matrix elements and phase shift differences calculated by these two methods are compared with the corresponding values determined from the complete experiment by Cherepkov et al (2000 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33 4213).
引用
收藏
页码:4803 / 4815
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vibrationally resolved photoionization of the OK-shell of CO molecule
    Semenov, SK
    Cherepkov, NA
    De Fanis, A
    Tamenori, Y
    Kitajima, M
    Tanaka, H
    Ueda, K
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY AND RELATED PHENOMENA, 2005, 144 : 211 - 214
  • [2] Photoelectron angular distributions from OK shell of oriented CO molecules:: A critical comparison between theory and experiment
    Ito, K
    Adachi, J
    Hikosaka, Y
    Motoki, S
    Soejima, K
    Yagishita, A
    Raseev, G
    Cherepkov, NA
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (01) : 46 - 49
  • [3] HYDROGEN MOLECULE - COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    WILKINSON, PG
    PRITCHARD, HO
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1969, 47 (22) : 2493 - +
  • [4] SHELL BINDING-ENERGIES OF NEUTRAL ATOMS - COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    DUTT, R
    VARSHNI, YP
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 80 (11): : 5639 - 5642
  • [5] COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENT AND THEORY
    BICKERTON, RJ
    TARONI, A
    WATKINS, ML
    WESSON, J
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1987, 322 (1563): : 173 - 188
  • [6] ON COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    BEARD, A
    FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1992, 19 (04) : 307 - 308
  • [7] Elastic peak of K shell excited HCl molecule:: Comparison HCl-DCl -: Experiment and theory
    Simon, M.
    Journel, L.
    Guillemin, R.
    Stolte, W. C.
    Minkov, I.
    Gel'mukhanov, F.
    Salek, P.
    Agren, H.
    Carniato, S.
    Taieb, R.
    Hudson, A. C.
    Lindle, D. W.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY AND RELATED PHENOMENA, 2007, 155 (1-3) : 91 - 94
  • [8] A COMPARISON BETWEEN ICRF THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    KOCH, R
    DESCAMPS, P
    LEBEAU, D
    MESSIAEN, AM
    VANEESTER, D
    WEYNANTS, RR
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1988, 30 (11) : 1559 - 1570
  • [9] SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
    BLAKE, JR
    COLOMBERA, PM
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1977, 32 (02) : 221 - 228
  • [10] COMPARISON OF THEORY AND EXPERIMENT FOR ANGLE-RESOLVED PHOTOEMISSION FROM TIN(100)
    JOHANSSON, LI
    LARSSON, CG
    CALLENAS, A
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS F-METAL PHYSICS, 1984, 14 (07): : 1761 - 1769