Comparison of scientific calipers and computer-enabled CT review for the measurement of skull base and craniomaxillofacial dimensions

被引:19
作者
Citardi, MJ
Herrmann, B
Hollenbeak, CS
Stack, BC
Cooper, M
Bucholz, RD
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Otolaryngol & Communicat Disorders, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat, St Louis, MO USA
[4] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hershey, PA USA
来源
SKULL BASE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2001年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
computer-aided surgery; 3D CT model; cephalometrics;
D O I
10.1055/s-2001-12781
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .1. LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
FRANTZ, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 60 (02) :111-&
[2]   RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .2. CONVENTIONAL ANGULAR AND LINEAR MEASURES [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
FRANTZ, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 60 (05) :505-&
[3]   A virtual reality system for bone fragment positioning in multisegment craniofacial surgical procedures [J].
Cutting, C ;
Grayson, B ;
McCarthy, JG ;
Thorne, C ;
Khorramabadi, D ;
Haddad, B ;
Taylor, R .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (07) :2436-2443
[4]   Application of a three-dimensional intraoperative navigational system in craniofacial surgery [J].
Demianczuk, ANA ;
Antonyshyn, OM .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 8 (04) :290-297
[5]   A STEREOTAXIC SYSTEM FOR GUIDING COMPLEX CRANIOFACIAL RECONSTRUCTION [J].
FIALKOV, JA ;
PHILLIPS, JH ;
GRUSS, JS ;
KASSEL, EE ;
ZUKER, RM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 89 (02) :340-345
[6]  
HALL DL, 1996, ANGLE ORTHOD, V67, P365
[7]   A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies [J].
Kragskov, J ;
SindetPedersen, S ;
Gyldensted, C ;
Jensen, KL .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (04) :402-411
[8]   Computer-assisted bone segment navigation [J].
Marmulla, R ;
Niederdellmann, H .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 26 (06) :347-359
[9]   AN INVESTIGATION INTO REPRODUCIBILITY OF SOME POINTS PLANES AND LINES USED IN CEPHALOMETRIC ANALYSIS [J].
RICHARDS.A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1966, 52 (09) :637-&
[10]   Growth in the external cranial base evaluated on human dry skulls, using nerve canal openings as references [J].
Sejrsen, B ;
Jakobsen, J ;
Skovgaard, LT ;
Kjaer, I .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 55 (06) :356-364