Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Simple Summary To treat locally advanced rectal cancer with a multimodality approach has led to improved oncological outcomes. Despite the trend of intensification of neoadjuvant therapy, surgery remains the mainstay treatment for rectal cancer. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) was shown to provide a better distal resection margin, less circumferential resection margin involvement, and a better short-term outcome than laparoscopic TME (LapTME) for mid-low rectal cancer. However, diverse oncological results were reported recently. We aimed to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of TaTME compared with LapTME in patients with lower rectal cancer. Our results showed that TaTME had similar histopathological results and postoperative outcomes as LapTME, even in the learning curve. However, a better DFS (72% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.038) and fewer LR events (9.5% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.031) were observed after TaTME. Thus, TaTME can be considered a safe and feasible approach in patients with low rectal cancer. Studies have reported positive short-term and histopathological results of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for mid-low rectal cancer. The long-term oncological outcomes are diverse, and concerns regarding the high local recurrence (LR) rate of TaTME have recently increased. We retrospectively analyzed 298 consecutive patients who underwent Laparoscopic TME (LapTME) or TaTME between January 2015 and December 2019. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was performed with patients matched for demographics and stage. After PSM, 63 patients were included in each group. The TaTME group had a longer mean operative time (394 vs. 333 min, p < 0.001). The blood loss, diverting stoma rate, and conversion rate were similar. Postoperatively, TaTME and LapTME had compatible complications, recovery, and hospital stay. A similar specimen quality was detected in both groups. After a mean follow-up period of 41-47 months, TaTME had less LR than LapTME (9.5% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.031). The 3-year overall survival was 80.3% in the TaTME group and 73.6% in the LapTME group (p = 0.331). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 72.0% in the TaTME group and 56.6% in the LapTME group (p = 0.038). In conclusion, better DFS and fewer LR events were observed after TaTME; thus, TaTME can be considered a safe and feasible approach in patients with low rectal cancer.