Joining Forces or Going It Alone? On the Interplay among External Collaboration Partner Types, Interfirm Governance Modes, and Internal R&D

被引:79
作者
Gesing, Judith [1 ,2 ]
Antons, David [3 ]
Piening, Erk P. [4 ]
Rese, Mario [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Salge, Torsten Oliver [3 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[2] Interdisciplinary Res Project TR29 Ind Product Se, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Aachen, Rheinisch Westfal Tech Hsch RWTH, Innovat Strategy & Org ISO Grp, Aachen, Germany
[4] ESCP Europe, Management, Berlin, Germany
[5] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Mario Rese Inspired Sales & Mkt Dept, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[6] Univ Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
[7] European Sch Management & Technol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; OPEN INNOVATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; RELATIONAL GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY; SEARCH; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1111/jpim.12227
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper adds to the emerging literature stream advocating a contingency view on open innovation. Drawing on the relational view of the firm, this study sheds light on the complex interplay among collaboration partner types (market- and science-focused innovation partners), governance modes (informal, self-enforcing and formal, contractual collaboration governance), and internal research and development(R&D). More specifically, it is proposed that the use of governance modes tailored to both the characteristics of each innovation partner type and the specific innovation objectives pursued by the focal firm (incremental and radical new product development) can increase the payoff from innovation collaboration. Moreover, appropriate collaboration governance is expected to reduce the focal firm's vulnerability to possible negative side effects often assumed to be associated with the simultaneous pursuit of external collaboration and internal R&D, among which most notably the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome. Cross-industry evidence from 2502 German firms underlines the critical role of collaboration governancea contingency factor that is at the heart of the relational view, yet has remained surprisingly absent from the open innovation debate so far.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 440
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   CUI BONO? THE SELECTIVE REVEALING OF KNOWLEDGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY [J].
Alexy, Oliver ;
George, Gerard ;
Salter, Ammon J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (02) :270-291
[2]   OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE [J].
Almirall, Esteve ;
Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) :27-47
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, OSL MAN
[5]  
Antons D., ACAD MANAGE IN PRESS
[6]   MAKE, BUY, ORGANIZE: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN RESEARCH, EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE, AND FIRM STRUCTURE [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Rios, Luis A. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) :317-337
[7]   Contract law, social norms and inter-firm cooperation [J].
Arrighetti, A ;
Bachmann, R ;
Deakin, S .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 21 (02) :171-195
[8]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[9]   Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms [J].
Belderbos, Rene ;
Faems, Dries ;
Leten, Bart ;
Van Looy, Bart .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (06) :869-882
[10]   Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances [J].
Bercovitz, Janet E. L. ;
Feldman, Maryann P. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (07) :930-948