Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure

被引:78
作者
Liu, Hu-Chen [1 ,2 ]
You, Jian-Xin [1 ,2 ]
You, Xiao-Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Interval; 2-tuple; Interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance (ITHWD); Combination weighting; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; REASONING APPROACH; VIKOR METHOD; SYSTEM; PRIORITIZATION; TRANSFUSION; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.018
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), as a usefulness and powerful risk assessment tool, has been widely utilized in different industries for improving the safety and reliability of systems. However, the conventional risk priority number (RPN) method shows some important weaknesses when applied in actual situations. Moreover, FMEA is a group decision behavior and FMEA team members tend to use different linguistic term sets to express their judgments because of their different backgrounds and preferences, some of which may be imprecise, uncertain and incomplete. In this paper, we propose a new risk priority model using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance (ITHWD) measure to solve the problems and improve the performance of the traditional FMEA. The new model can not only handle the uncertainty and diversity of FMEA team members' assessment information but also consider the subjective and objective weights of risk factors in the risk ranking process. The model has exact characteristic and can avoid information distortion and loss in the linguistic information processing. Finally, a case study of blood transfusion is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and benefits of the proposed approach. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, P 10 ANN M AS
[2]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[3]  
Braglia M., 2000, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V17, P1017, DOI [10.1108/02656710010353885, DOI 10.1108/02656710010353885]
[4]   Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety [J].
Callum, JL ;
Kaplan, HS ;
Merkley, LL ;
Pinkerton, PH ;
Fastman, BR ;
Romans, RA ;
Coovadia, AS ;
Reis, MD .
TRANSFUSION, 2001, 41 (10) :1204-1211
[5]   Applying DEA to enhance assessment capability of FMEA [J].
Chang, Dong-Shang ;
Sun, Kuo-Lung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (06) :629-+
[6]   Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2009, 48 (01) :246-256
[7]   Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (06) :1768-1779
[8]   Failure mode and effects analysis using grey theory [J].
Chang, C.-L. ;
Liu, P.-H. ;
Wei, C.-C. .
Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2001, 12 (03) :211-216
[9]   Fuzzy methodology applied to Probabilistic Safety Assessment for digital system in nuclear power plants [J].
Ferreira Guimaraes, Antonio Cesar ;
Franklin Lapa, Celso Marcelo ;
Moreira, Maria de Lourdes .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2011, 241 (09) :3967-3976
[10]   An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights [J].
Fullér, R ;
Majlender, P .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 124 (01) :53-57