An analysis of three different prostate cancer risk calculators applied prior to prostate biopsy: A Turkish cohort validation study

被引:3
作者
Yildizhan, Mehmet [1 ]
Balci, Melih [1 ]
Eroglu, Unsal [1 ]
Asil, Erem [1 ]
Coser, Seref [1 ]
Ozercan, Ali Yasin [1 ]
Koseoglu, Burak [1 ]
Guzel, Ozer [1 ]
Asfuroglu, Ahmet [2 ]
Tuncel, Altug [3 ]
机构
[1] Ankara City Hosp, Dept Urol, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Etimesgut State Hosp, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Ankara City Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol Affiliated, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; risk calculator; transrectal ultrasonography; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ANTIGEN; PREDICTION; ERSPC; COMPLICATIONS; NG/ML; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/and.14329
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
The study aimed to investigate the best-performing of three risk calculators (RCs) for the Turkish population in predicting cancer-free status and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. The electronic medical records of 527 patients who underwent prostate biopsy for the first time due to PSA of 0.3-50 ng/dl and/or cancer suspicion at digital rectal examination (DRE) between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrieved retrospectively. The predictive power of the RCs in the biopsy and the surgical cohort was calculated by two urologists using European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) RC, the North American Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial-RC (PCPT-RC), and the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG)-RC. All three RCs were successful in predicting PCa and high-risk disease at ROC analysis (p < 0.0001). Of these three nomograms, PBCG-RC outperformed PCPT-RC 2.0 and ERSPC-RH in predicting benign pathology outcomes at biopsy. A better performance of PBCG-RC was also observed in terms of prediction of high-risk disease at biopsy. Using any of the available RCs prior to biopsy is of greater assistance to prostate-specific antigen and DRE than examination alone. The study results show that PBCG-RC performed before biopsy has a higher predictive power than the other two RCs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   'Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator' mobile applications (Apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) [J].
Adam, Ahmed ;
Hellig, Julian C. ;
Perera, Marlon ;
Bolton, Damien ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) :565-573
[2]   A Contemporary Prostate Biopsy Risk Calculator Based on Multiple Heterogeneous Cohorts [J].
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Straubinger, Johanna ;
Selig, Katharina ;
Guerrios, Lourdes ;
De Hoedt, Amanda ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Liss, Michael A. ;
Leach, Robin J. ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Nam, Robert ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Poyet, Cedric ;
Vertosick, Emily ;
Vickers, Andrew J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (02) :197-203
[3]   Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 for the Prediction of Low- vs High-grade Prostate Cancer [J].
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Hoefler, Josef ;
Bock, Sebastian ;
Goodman, Phyllis J. ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Leach, Robin J. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (06) :1362-1367
[4]   Contemporary Role of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 in the Management of Prostate Cancer [J].
Auprich, Marco ;
Bjartell, Anders ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
de la Taille, Alexandre ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Schalken, Jack ;
Stenzl, Arnulf ;
Tombal, Bertrand ;
van der Poel, Henk .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (05) :1045-1054
[5]   A comparative effectiveness analysis of the PBCG vs. PCPT risks calculators in a multi-ethnic cohort [J].
Carbunaru, Samuel ;
Nettey, Oluwarotimi S. ;
Gogana, Pooja ;
Helenowski, Irene B. ;
Jovanovic, Borko ;
Ruden, Maria ;
Hollowell, Courtney M. P. ;
Sharifi, Roohollah ;
Kittles, Rick A. ;
Schaeffer, Edward ;
Gann, Peter ;
Murphy, Adam B. .
BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
[6]   Screening for Prostate Cancer [J].
Carlsson, Sigrid, V ;
Vickers, Andrew J. .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 104 (06) :1051-+
[7]   A Multicenter Study of [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen and Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml Prostate Specific Antigen Range [J].
Catalona, William J. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Klee, George G. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Slawin, Kevin M. ;
Marks, Leonard S. ;
Loeb, Stacy ;
Broyles, Dennis L. ;
Shin, Sanghyuk S. ;
Cruz, Amabelle B. ;
Chan, Daniel W. ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Roberts, William L. ;
van Schaik, Ron H. N. ;
Mizrahi, Isaac A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05) :1650-1655
[8]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[9]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[10]   Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Dikshit, Rajesh ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Rebelo, Marise ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell ;
Forman, David ;
Bray, Freddie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) :E359-E386