Estimation of effective dose using the dose length product in chest computed tomography procedures

被引:2
作者
Mpumelelo, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sefako Makgatho Hlth Sci Univ, Ga Rankuwa, South Africa
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2021年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
Computed tomography; dose length product; thermoluminescent dosimeters; effective dose; optimization; DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS; CT;
D O I
10.29242/ijrr.19.4.979
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Approximation of radiation risks in computed tomography (CT) requires knowledge of specific organ doses. A Rando phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) provide a proxy for in-vivo measurements. In this study, measured chest CT doses were used to calculate dose length product (DLP), a dosimetric needed for estimation of effective dose (E). Method and Materials: Ninety-five calibrated TLDs embedded at peripheral and central positions of Rando phantom chest slice measured chest CT dose during imaging using Phillips Brilliance 64-slice CT scanner. Three measurements were conducted each with new TLDs. Irradiated TLDs were read with a Harshaw TLD reader (Model 3500). One-way ANOVA test verified statistical significance of TLD measurements. TLD doses were used to calculate chest CT dose given as dose length product (DLP), a product of chest slice CT dose measured by volumetric CT dose index (CTDIv) multiplied by scan length. Consequently, E was calculated as the product of DLP and k, an adult chest conversion factor published by International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103. Results: Differences in mean TLDs measurements were statistically significant (p=0.032). The mean chest slice peripheral and center doses were 3.61 +/- 0.6 and 4.60 +/- 0.31 mGy respectively. Adult chest CT dose was 178.8 +/- 15 mGy. E was estimated as 2.5 +/- 0.21 mSv. It is than the range (5.6 - 9.3 mSv) found in literature. Conclusion: E relates radiation exposure to stochastic effects. The estimated value (E = 2.5 +/- 0.21 mSv), reveals that chest CT protocol used was optimized.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 986
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Aldrich JE, 2006, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V57, P79
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, PUBLICATIONS
  • [3] Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), COMM AUSTR 2019
  • [4] Health Canada Safety Code 35: Awareness of the Impacts for Diagnostic Radiology in Canada
    Bjarnason, Thorarin A.
    Thakur, Yogesh
    Aldrich, John E.
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2013, 64 (01): : 6 - 9
  • [5] Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure
    Brenner, David J.
    Hall, Eric J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) : 2277 - 2284
  • [6] Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey
    Brix, G
    Nagel, HD
    Stamm, G
    Veit, R
    Lechel, U
    Griebel, J
    Galanski, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (08) : 1979 - 1991
  • [7] Burke K, 1779, BRIT J RA DIOL, V70, P261
  • [8] Chun-Sing W, 2012, EUR J RADIOL, V81, P264
  • [9] Application of draft European Commission reference levels to a regional CT dose survey
    Clarke, J
    Cranley, K
    Robinson, J
    Smith, PHS
    Workman, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (865) : 43 - 50
  • [10] European Commission, 1999, REG POP AG EU DIFF S, V112, P1