A Comparison of Standard Modeling Techniques Using Digital Aerial Imagery with National Elevation Datasets and Airborne LiDAR to Predict Size and Density Forest Metrics in the Sapphire Mountains MT, USA

被引:5
作者
Ahl, Robert [1 ]
Hogland, John [2 ]
Brown, Steve [3 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, RedCastle Resources Inc, Northern Reg Geospatial Grp, USDA, 26 Ft Missoula Rd, Missoula, MT 59808 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, 800 E Beckwith, Missoula, MT 59801 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Northern Reg Geospatial Grp, USDA, 26 Ft Missoula Rd, Missoula, MT 59808 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
modeling; comparison; forest metrics; NAIP; LIDAR; AIC; Montana;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi8010024
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In recent years airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology has received a great deal of attention. Using airborne LiDAR, analysts have successfully related height measurements to forest characteristics such as tree size, basal area, and number of trees. Similarly, National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) digital aerial imagery in combination with elevation datasets such as the National Elevation Dataset (NED) have been used to estimate similar forest characteristics. Few comparisons, however, have been made between using airborne LiDAR, NAIP, and NED to estimate forest characteristics. In this study we compare airborne LiDAR, NAIP, and NAIP assisted NED based models of forest characteristics commonly used within forest management at the spatial scale of field plots and forest stands. Our findings suggest that there is a high degree of similarity in model fit and estimated values when using LiDAR, NAIP, and NAIP assisted NED predictor variables.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO), 2018, IM PROGR
[2]  
Ahl R., 2017, NRGGPRBITLOVMAP2016
[3]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[4]  
Akaike H., 1998, 2 INT S INF THEOR, P199, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-015
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FUSION/LDV: Software for LiDAR Data Analysis and Visualization
[6]  
Avery T.E., 1994, Forest Measurements, V4th, P408
[7]  
Barber J., 2016, MIDLEVEL BASE LEVEL, P12
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]  
Burns R.M., 1990, SILVICS N AM AGR HDB, V2, P1
[10]  
Bush R., 2016, 162 USDA FOR SERV