The Italian ICD-11 field trial: clinical utility of diagnostic guidelines for schizophrenia and related disorders

被引:6
作者
Luciano, Mario [1 ]
Sampogna, Gaia [1 ]
Del Vecchio, Valeria [1 ]
Giallonardo, Vincenzo [1 ]
Palummo, Carmela [1 ]
Pocai, Benedetta [1 ]
Steardo, Luca, Jr. [2 ]
Zinno, Francesca [1 ]
Rebello, Tahilia [3 ]
Reed, Geoffrey M. [3 ]
Fiorillo, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania L Vanvitelli, WHO Collaborating Ctr Res & Training Mental Hlth, Naples, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dipartimento Sci Salute, Catanzaro, Italy
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, WHO Collaborating Ctr Capac Bldg & Training Globa, New York, NY USA
关键词
ICD-11; Clinical utility; Diagnosis; Schizophrenia; Schizoaffective disorder; Goodness of fit; MENTAL-HEALTH SETTINGS; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS; WORLD CONGRESS; DSM; PSYCHIATRY; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; SYMPTOMS; SESSIONS; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1186/s13033-020-0338-z
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Disorders (ICD-11) has been released. In order to test the clinical consistency and the clinical utility of the proposed guidelines the World Health Organization (WHO) has carried out the Ecological Implementation Field Studies in various countries. In this paper the results of the Italian field trials on the clinical utility of the ICD-11 diagnostic guideline concerning schizophrenia and related disorders will be presented. Methods In Italy, field trials have been carried out at the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli". All patients showing any psychotic symptom and referring to the outpatient and inpatient units have been recruited. Patients were interviewed by two clinicians with whom they had not had any prior clinical contact. At the end of each interview, clinicians were asked to complete 12 questions about the clinical utility of the diagnostic guidelines as applied to each patient. Results Fourteen clinicians and 100 patients have been involved. The ICD-11 clinical guidelines were perceived as easy to use, with an adequate goodness of fit, clear and understandable and with an adequate level of details and specificity to describe the essential features of the diagnoses. Clinicians rated very positively their usefulness in describing the threshold between patient's disorder and normality. Despite still very positive, the guidelines have been perceived as less useful to select a treatment, to assess patients' prognosis and to communicate with other mental health professionals. Conclusions The 11th revision of the chapter on Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders has made substantive changes to the conceptualization of mental disorders which could have impacted on their reliability and clinical utility. Results of the Italian field studies, in line with those reported by the international sample, highlight that ICD-11 has been rated as highly clinically useful by participating clinician, more than the ICD-10. This could be considered a good reason to be optimistic about the implementation of the ICD-11 among global clinicians. Trial registration The study has been approved by the Ethical Review Board of the University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli" (N. 416, 2016)
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: An example of unintended consequences
    Andreasen, Nancy C.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [2] ICD-11 sessions in the 17th World Congress of Psychiatry
    De Rosa, Corrado
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 17 (01): : 119 - 120
  • [3] Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey
    First, Michael B.
    Rebello, Tahilia J.
    Keeley, Jared W.
    Bhargava, Rachna
    Dai, Yunfei
    Kulygina, Maya
    Matsumoto, Chihiro
    Robles, Rebeca
    Stona, Anne-Claire
    Reed, Geoffrey M.
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 17 (02): : 187 - 195
  • [4] The development of the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines for Mental and Behavioural Disorders
    First, Michael B.
    Reed, Geoffrey M.
    Hyman, Steven E.
    Saxena, Shekhar
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 14 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [5] Clinical Utility in the Revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
    First, Michael B.
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 41 (06) : 465 - 473
  • [6] What are 'good' depression symptoms? Comparing the centrality of DSM and non-DSM symptoms of depression in a network analysis
    Fried, Eiko I.
    Epskamp, Sacha
    Nesse, Randolph M.
    Tuerlinckx, Francis
    Borsboom, Denny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 189 : 314 - 320
  • [7] Categorical and/or continuous? Learning from vascular surgery
    Fulford, Kenneth W. M.
    Handa, Ashok
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 17 (03) : 304 - 305
  • [8] Public stakeholders' comments on ICD-11 chapters related to mental and sexual health
    Fuss, Johannes
    Lemay, Kyle
    Stein, Dan J.
    Briken, Peer
    Jakob, Robert
    Reed, Geoffrey M.
    Kogan, Cary S.
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 18 (02) : 233 - 235
  • [9] Neurocognitive disorders in ICD-11: the debate and its outcome
    Gaebel, Wolfgang
    Jessen, Frank
    Kanba, Shigenobu
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 17 (02): : 229 - 230
  • [10] Status of Psychotic Disorders in ICD-11
    Gaebel, Wolfgang
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (05) : 895 - 898