General practitioners' views on genomics, practice and education A qualitative interview study

被引:0
作者
Cusack, Marie Brigitte [1 ]
Hickerton, Chriselle [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nisselle, Amy [2 ,3 ,4 ]
McClaren, Belinda [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Terrill, Bronwyn [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Gaff, Clara [3 ,4 ,6 ,8 ]
Dunlop, Kate [6 ]
Metcalfe, Sylvia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NSW Hlth Ctr Genet Educ, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[2] Australian Genom Hlth Alliance, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Genom Soc, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Garvan Inst Med Res, Manager Educ & Commun, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[6] Australian Genom Hlth Alliance, Program 4 Working Grp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Walter & Eliza Hall Inst Med Res, Melbourne Genom Hlth Alliance, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRIMARY-CARE; GENETICS EDUCATION; SERVICES; PHYSICIANS; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICINE; BARRIERS; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and objective Genomics is moving rapidly into mainstream medicine through clinical genomic testing and consumer-initiated online DNA testing. The aim of this study was to identify Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views on genomics, impact on practice and educational needs to inform continuing education. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted, with constant comparative inductive analysis and governance from a national taskforce. Results Twenty-eight GPs (43% female) were interviewed; 71% worked in a metropolitan workplace. Most initially reported little experience with genetic/genomic tests but, when prompted, recognised encountering genomics, mainly non-invasive prenatal and single-gene tests. Many GPs referred patients for cancer screening to genetic services or specialists. GPs reported needing continuing education and resources, with preferences underpinned by relevance to practice. Discussion GPs are integrating genomic testing into care, mainly through prenatal screening, and anticipate further impact. They want diverse and context-dependent education but are unaware of some available resources, such as The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' Genomics in general practice guideline.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 752
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians
    Acheson, LS
    Stange, KC
    Zyzanski, S
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 7 (07) : 501 - 508
  • [2] Bathurst Laurence, 2006, Aust Fam Physician, V35, P462
  • [3] Developing a curriculum statement based on clinical practice: genetics in primary care
    Burke, Sarah
    Martyn, Melissa
    Stone, Anna
    Bennett, Catherine
    Thomas, Hywel
    Farndon, Peter
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2009, 59 (559) : 99 - 103
  • [4] Burton H., 2003, ADDRESSING GENETICS
  • [5] Cancer Institute NSW, 2017, 1147 CANC I NSW
  • [6] Carroll JC, 2016, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V62, pE626
  • [7] The Gene Messenger Impact Project: An Innovative Genetics Continuing Education Strategy for Primary Care Providers
    Carroll, June C.
    Grad, Roland
    Allanson, Judith E.
    Pluye, Pierre
    Permaul, Joanne A.
    Pimlott, Nicholas
    Wilson, Brenda J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2016, 36 (03) : 171 - 178
  • [8] GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians
    Carroll, June C.
    Wilson, Brenda J.
    Allanson, Judith
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Blaine, Sean M.
    Meschino, Wendy S.
    Permaul, Joanne A.
    Graham, Ian D.
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 28 (06) : 615 - 623
  • [9] Carroll JC, 2009, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V55, pE92
  • [10] Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers
    Charmaz, Kathy
    [J]. QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2014, 20 (09) : 1074 - 1084