A System of Administrative Justice at the Service of Citizens: Proposals for a Reform

被引:0
|
作者
Agudo Gonzalez, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Derecho Adm, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA DIGITAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO | 2022年 / 28期
关键词
Administrative Justice; Judicial Review; Quasi-jurisdictional Administrative Control; Integrated System; Citizenship; Control Mechanisms of Administrative Action;
D O I
10.18601/21452946.n28.02
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Judges and courts have the constitutional duty of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and, in their relations with the Public Administration, of doing so by reviewing the legality of administrative action. The jurisdictional function optimizes all legal conditions -in terms of independence and impartiality, procedural guarantees...-, to ensure that judicial bodies make justice in a specific case. Judicial review does not impede the legal configuration of administrative control mechanisms oriented to the same purpose. The lawmaker can set up administrative bodies and agencies with a special statute similar to that of the judicial bodies, conferring legality control functions aimed at providing justice. The truly inalienable constitutional limit is that the eventual provision of these control mechanisms cannot prevent access to the jurisdiction to review the decision adopted within it. A renewed administrative justice system must find in the complementation of the function between judicial bodies and quasi-jurisdictional administrative bodies, the basis to guarantee the protection of citizens in terms of access, procedural guarantees, costs and time.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 51
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Administrative justice as a deterrent to the implementation of tasks within criminal proceedings
    Ihor, Paryzkyi
    Serhii, Matvieiev
    Serhii, Bratel
    Pavlo, Komirchyi
    Artem, Zubko
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2021, 10 (40): : 93 - 99
  • [32] EIA decision-making and administrative justice: an empirical analysis
    Alberts, R. C.
    Retief, F. P.
    Roos, C.
    Cilliers, D. P.
    Fischer, T. B.
    Arts, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 65 (10) : 1914 - 1931
  • [33] EIA decision-making and administrative justice: an empirical analysis
    Alberts, R. C.
    Retief, F. P.
    Roos, C.
    Cilliers, D. P.
    Fischer, T. B.
    Arts, J.
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2023, 38 (04) : 605 - 605
  • [34] THE RANGE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE SPECIALIZATIONS IN RUSSIA AND THE OTHER BRICS COUNTRIES
    Kleandrov, Mikhail
    Pluzhnik, Irina
    BRICS LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 5 (02): : 24 - 48
  • [35] Customers, Citizens, and Residents: The Semantics of Public Service Recipients
    Lucio, Joanna
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2009, 41 (07) : 878 - 899
  • [36] THE OMBUDSMAN, TRIBUNALS AND ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE SECTION Evolving standards in the complaints branch
    Kirkham, Richard
    Wells, Philip
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2014, 36 (02) : 190 - 207
  • [37] An empirical study of administrative justice at times of COVID-19 in Italy
    Di Vita, Giuseppe
    Ferrara, Paolo Lorenzo
    Patti, Alessandra
    REGIONAL STUDIES REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (01): : 558 - 582
  • [38] Ombudsman, Tribunals and Administrative Justice in the Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
    Marsons, Lee
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2023, 45 (03) : 265 - 277
  • [39] Making sense of the muddle: the ombudsman and administrative justice, 2002-2011
    Abraham, Ann
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2012, 34 (01) : 91 - 103
  • [40] Administrative Justice in Kenya: Learning from South Africa's Mistakes
    Hoexter, Cora
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN LAW, 2018, 62 (01) : 105 - 128