Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium-sized enterprises

被引:99
作者
Crossley, Richard M. [1 ]
Elmagrhi, Mohamed H. [2 ]
Ntim, Collins G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Accounting & Finance Div, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds LS6 1AN, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Swansea Univ, Hawkes Ctr Empir Finance, Dept Accounting & Finance, Sch Management, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Southampton, Ctr Res Accounting Accountabil & Governance CRAAG, Dept Accounting, Southampton Business Sch, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
environmental performance; environmental policy and sustainability; legitimacy theory; SMEs; social and environmental practices; substantive and symbolic legitimation; UK; RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FIRM SIZE; SMES; PERFORMANCE; CSR; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; COMMUNICATION; STAKEHOLDERS;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2837
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to identify and gain insights into small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) rationales (why) for engaging in sustainable social and environmental practices (SEPs) that influence social and environmental policy and sustainability changes. Specifically, we depart from the predominately quantitative-orientated SEPs literature by conducting in-depth interviews and analysis of owners and managers of SMEs in the United Kingdom within a legitimacy theoretical framework. Our findings from a comprehensive number of interviewees show that SMEs employ a complex mix of both symbolic and substantive SEPs with the aim of enhancing the legitimacy and sustainability of their operations. The results emphasise the strengths of social engagement, reputation and image, environmental embeddedness, industry differentiation and education facilitators. In particular, the paper shows that legitimating strategies can have a dual purpose of being symbolic in nature but also inferring a substantive legitimacy claim. Evidence of SMEs maintaining their legitimacy position stretches further via either a moral and/or a pragmatic standpoint.
引用
收藏
页码:3740 / 3762
页数:23
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]  
Ackerman L D, 1984, J Bus Strategy, V5, P56, DOI 10.1108/eb039047
[2]   The internet and change in corporate stakeholder engagement and communication strategies on social and environmental performance [J].
Adams, Carol ;
Frost, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2006, 2 (03) :281-+
[3]   Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication [J].
Aerts, Walter ;
Cormier, Denis .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 34 (01) :1-27
[4]   A comprehensive literature review on, and the construction of a framework for, environmental legitimacy, accountability and proactivity [J].
Alrazi, Bakhtiar ;
de Villiers, Char ;
van Staden, Chris J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 102 :44-57
[5]   The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving [J].
Amato, Louis H. ;
Amato, Christie H. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 72 (03) :229-241
[6]  
[Anonymous], Business Population Estimates for the UK and Regions 2019
[7]  
Apitsa S.M., 2019, CRITICAL STATE CORPO
[8]   Environmental strategy and performance in small firms:: A resource-based perspective [J].
Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto ;
Hurtado-Torres, Nuria ;
Sharma, Sanjay ;
Garcia-Morales, Victor J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (01) :88-103
[9]   THE DOUBLE-EDGE OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Gibbs, Barrie W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (02) :177-194
[10]   Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: The mediating role of environmental performance [J].
Aslam, Shoaib ;
Elmagrhi, Mohamed H. ;
Rehman, Ramiz Ur ;
Ntim, Collins G. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (04) :1655-1673