Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Liver Donors on Postoperative Liver Function in Donors and Recipients Following Liver Transplantation A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:44
|
作者
Jung, Kyeo-Woon [1 ]
Kang, Jiwon [1 ]
Kwon, Hye-Mee [1 ]
Moon, Young-Jin [1 ]
Jun, In-Gu [1 ]
Song, Jun-Gol [1 ]
Hwang, Gyu-Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Lab Cardiovasc Dynam, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ischemia reperfusion injury; liver transplantation; remote ischemic preconditioning; REPERFUSION INJURY; CARDIAC-SURGERY; KIDNEY INJURY; COMPLICATIONS; REGENERATION; HEPATECTOMY; MECHANISMS; PROTOCOLS; DECREASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003498
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on liver function in donors and recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Background: Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to be associated with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. RIPC is used to lessen the harmful effects of IRI. Methods: A total of 148 donors were randomly assigned to RIPC (n = 75) and control (n = 73) groups. RIPC involves 3 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg to the upper arm, followed by 5-minute reperfusion with cuff deflation. The primary aim was to assess postoperative liver function in donors and recipients and the incidence of early allograft dysfunction and graft failure in recipients. Results: RIPC was not associated with any differences in postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase levels after living donor hepatectomy, and it did not decrease the incidence of delayed graft hepatic function (6.7% vs 0.0%,P= 0.074) in donors. AST level on postoperative day 1 [217.0 (158.0, 288.0) vs 259.5 (182.0, 340.0),P= 0.033] and maximal AST level within 7 postoperative days [244.0 (167.0, 334.0) vs 296.0 (206.0, 395.5),P= 0.029) were significantly lower in recipients who received a preconditioned graft. No differences were found in the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (4.1% vs 5.6%,P= 0.955) or graft failure (1.4% vs 5.6%,P= 0.346) among recipients. Conclusions: RIPC did not improve liver function in living donor hepatectomy. However, RIPC performed in liver donors may be beneficial for postoperative liver function in recipients after living donor liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of life quality in living donors after liver transplantation
    Xu, Dong-Wei
    Long, Xi-Dai
    Xia, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [32] Staged preoperative evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation
    Sotomayor, Camila
    Garcia, Daniel
    Rebolledo, Patricia
    Dominguez, Maria Pilar
    Pastore, Antonia
    Achurra, Pablo
    Vinuela, Eduardo
    Arab, Juan Pablo
    Benitez, Carlos
    Huete, Alvaro
    Briceno, Eduardo
    Martinez, Jorge
    Jarufe, Nicolas
    Dib, Martin J.
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2025, 10
  • [33] Analysis of postsurgical complications in 75 living liver transplantation donors
    Hakan Sozen
    Hamdi Karakayali
    Gokhan Moray
    Aydin Dalgic
    Remzi Emiroglu
    Mehmet Haberal
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2006, 10 (5) : 646 - 651
  • [34] Living donor liver transplantation: Complications in donors and interventional management
    Lee, SY
    Ko, GY
    Gwon, DI
    Song, HY
    Lee, SG
    Yoon, HK
    Sung, KB
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (02) : 443 - 449
  • [35] Does Liver Ischemic Preconditioning in Brain Death Donors Induce Kidney Preconditioning? A Retrospective Analysis
    Desai, Kunj K.
    Mora-Esteves, Cesar
    Holland, Bart K.
    Dikdan, George
    Fisher, Adrian
    Wilson, Dorian J.
    Koneru, Baburao
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [36] Health-related quality of life in living liver donors after transplantation
    Chen, Pei-Xian
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 10 (04) : 356 - 361
  • [37] Effects of donors' and recipients' preoperative serum sodium on the prognosis of liver transplantation
    Chen, Yabin
    Li, Hao
    Zhang, Menggang
    Wu, Zeyu
    Fang, Haoran
    Wen, Peihao
    Zhang, Jiakai
    Guo, Wenzhi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [38] The ischemic preconditioning paradox in deceased donor liver transplantation-evidence from a prospective randomized single blind clinical trial
    Koneru, B.
    Shareef, A.
    Dikdan, G.
    Desai, K.
    Klein, K. M.
    Peng, B.
    Wachsberg, R. H.
    de la Torre, A. N.
    Debroy, M.
    Fisher, A.
    Wilson, D. J.
    Samanta, A. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (12) : 2788 - 2796
  • [39] Effect of Preemptive Therapy vs Antiviral Prophylaxis on Cytomegalovirus Disease in Seronegative Liver Transplant Recipients With Seropositive Donors A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Singh, Nina
    Winston, Drew J.
    Razonable, Raymund R.
    Lyon, G. Marshall
    Silveira, Fernanda P.
    Wagener, Marilyn M.
    Stevens-Ayers, Terry
    Edmison, Bradley
    Boeckh, Michael
    Limaye, Ajit P.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (14): : 1378 - 1387
  • [40] Psychosocial data of potential living donors before living donor liver transplantation
    Walter, M
    Bronner, E
    Steinmüller, T
    Klapp, BF
    Danzer, G
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 16 (01) : 55 - 59