Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Liver Donors on Postoperative Liver Function in Donors and Recipients Following Liver Transplantation A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:44
|
作者
Jung, Kyeo-Woon [1 ]
Kang, Jiwon [1 ]
Kwon, Hye-Mee [1 ]
Moon, Young-Jin [1 ]
Jun, In-Gu [1 ]
Song, Jun-Gol [1 ]
Hwang, Gyu-Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Lab Cardiovasc Dynam, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ischemia reperfusion injury; liver transplantation; remote ischemic preconditioning; REPERFUSION INJURY; CARDIAC-SURGERY; KIDNEY INJURY; COMPLICATIONS; REGENERATION; HEPATECTOMY; MECHANISMS; PROTOCOLS; DECREASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003498
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on liver function in donors and recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Background: Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to be associated with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. RIPC is used to lessen the harmful effects of IRI. Methods: A total of 148 donors were randomly assigned to RIPC (n = 75) and control (n = 73) groups. RIPC involves 3 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg to the upper arm, followed by 5-minute reperfusion with cuff deflation. The primary aim was to assess postoperative liver function in donors and recipients and the incidence of early allograft dysfunction and graft failure in recipients. Results: RIPC was not associated with any differences in postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase levels after living donor hepatectomy, and it did not decrease the incidence of delayed graft hepatic function (6.7% vs 0.0%,P= 0.074) in donors. AST level on postoperative day 1 [217.0 (158.0, 288.0) vs 259.5 (182.0, 340.0),P= 0.033] and maximal AST level within 7 postoperative days [244.0 (167.0, 334.0) vs 296.0 (206.0, 395.5),P= 0.029) were significantly lower in recipients who received a preconditioned graft. No differences were found in the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (4.1% vs 5.6%,P= 0.955) or graft failure (1.4% vs 5.6%,P= 0.346) among recipients. Conclusions: RIPC did not improve liver function in living donor hepatectomy. However, RIPC performed in liver donors may be beneficial for postoperative liver function in recipients after living donor liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can Beaver Tail Liver be the Cause of Preference in Living Liver Transplantation Donors?
    Cankaya, Bahar Yilmaz
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [22] Remote ischaemic preconditioning in orthotopic liver transplantation (RIPCOLT trial): a pilot randomized controlled feasibility study
    Robertson, Francis P.
    Goswami, Rup
    Wright, Graham P.
    Imber, Charles
    Sharma, Dinesh
    Malago, Massimo
    Fuller, Barry J.
    Davidson, Brian R.
    HPB, 2017, 19 (09) : 757 - 767
  • [23] Unilateral ischemic preconditioning and heterologous preconditioning in living donor liver transplantation
    Testa, Giuliano
    Angelova, Victoria
    Laricchia-Robbio, Leopoldo
    Rondelli, Damiano
    Chejfec, Gregorio
    Anthony, Tiffany
    Benedetti, Enrico
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [24] Endotoxin levels in donors and recipients during orthotopic liver transplantation
    Pillay, SP
    Wynter, C
    Lynch, S
    Wall, D
    Balderson, G
    Strong, R
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 67 (04): : 187 - 191
  • [25] Effect of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on Patients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Kim, Won Ho
    Lee, Jong-Hwan
    Ko, Justine Sangwook
    Min, Jeong Jin
    Gwak, Mi Sook
    Kim, Gaab Soo
    Lee, Suk Koo
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 (11) : 1383 - 1392
  • [26] Consequences of the Use of Extended Criteria Donors in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Dirican, Abuzer
    Ozsoy, Mustafa
    Ates, Mustafa
    Ersan, Veysel
    Gonultas, Fatih
    Isik, Burak
    Yilmaz, Sezai
    Annals of Transplantation, 2015, 20 : 211 - 217
  • [27] Living donor liver transplantation: post-operative imaging follow-up of right lobe liver donors
    Tejura, Tapas K.
    Pita, Alejandro
    Romero, Christian
    Genyk, Yuri S.
    Sher, Linda
    Palmer, Suzanne L.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (10) : 2673 - 2678
  • [28] Postoperative incision scars and cosmetic satisfaction of living liver donors
    Hsu, Ya-Lan
    Hsieh, Chia-En
    Lin, Ping-Yi
    Lin, Shin-Lung
    Lin, Kuo-Hua
    Weng, Li-Chueh
    Chen, Yao-Li
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (23) : E26187
  • [29] Exploring the Viability of Matching Marginal Donors With Low Renal Function Recipients in Liver Transplantation
    Akabane, Miho
    Imaoka, Yuki
    Nakayama, Toshihiro
    Esquivel, Carlos O.
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2025, 39 (03)
  • [30] Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation using elderly donors
    Han, Jae Hyun
    You, Young Kyoung
    Na, Gun Hyung
    Kim, Eun Young
    Lee, Soo Ho
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Kim, Dong Goo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, 86 (04) : 184 - 191