Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Liver Donors on Postoperative Liver Function in Donors and Recipients Following Liver Transplantation A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:44
|
作者
Jung, Kyeo-Woon [1 ]
Kang, Jiwon [1 ]
Kwon, Hye-Mee [1 ]
Moon, Young-Jin [1 ]
Jun, In-Gu [1 ]
Song, Jun-Gol [1 ]
Hwang, Gyu-Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Lab Cardiovasc Dynam, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ischemia reperfusion injury; liver transplantation; remote ischemic preconditioning; REPERFUSION INJURY; CARDIAC-SURGERY; KIDNEY INJURY; COMPLICATIONS; REGENERATION; HEPATECTOMY; MECHANISMS; PROTOCOLS; DECREASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003498
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on liver function in donors and recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Background: Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to be associated with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. RIPC is used to lessen the harmful effects of IRI. Methods: A total of 148 donors were randomly assigned to RIPC (n = 75) and control (n = 73) groups. RIPC involves 3 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg to the upper arm, followed by 5-minute reperfusion with cuff deflation. The primary aim was to assess postoperative liver function in donors and recipients and the incidence of early allograft dysfunction and graft failure in recipients. Results: RIPC was not associated with any differences in postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase levels after living donor hepatectomy, and it did not decrease the incidence of delayed graft hepatic function (6.7% vs 0.0%,P= 0.074) in donors. AST level on postoperative day 1 [217.0 (158.0, 288.0) vs 259.5 (182.0, 340.0),P= 0.033] and maximal AST level within 7 postoperative days [244.0 (167.0, 334.0) vs 296.0 (206.0, 395.5),P= 0.029) were significantly lower in recipients who received a preconditioned graft. No differences were found in the incidence of early allograft dysfunction (4.1% vs 5.6%,P= 0.955) or graft failure (1.4% vs 5.6%,P= 0.346) among recipients. Conclusions: RIPC did not improve liver function in living donor hepatectomy. However, RIPC performed in liver donors may be beneficial for postoperative liver function in recipients after living donor liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 653
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning among donors and recipients following pediatric liver transplantation: A randomized clinical trial
    Qi, Bo
    Wang, Xiao-Qiang
    Pan, Shu-Ting
    Li, Pei-Ying
    Chen, Ling-Ke
    Xia, Qiang
    Yang, Li-Qun
    Yu, Wei-Feng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (04)
  • [2] Impact of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Conducted in Living Kidney Donors on Renal Function in Donors and Recipients Following Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bang, Ji-Yeon
    Kim, Sae-Gyeol
    Oh, Jimi
    Kim, Seon-Ok
    Go, Yon-Ji
    Hwang, Gyu-Sam
    Song, Jun-Gol
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)
  • [3] Effect of Graft Type on Postoperative Liver Function Recovery in Living Liver Donors
    Karakayali, H.
    Pehlivan, S.
    Yagmurdur, M. C.
    Savas, N.
    Coskun, M.
    Tarhan, C.
    Haberal, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 41 (07) : 2855 - 2859
  • [4] Effect of Portal Venous Pressure on Liver Function of Donors in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Khalil, Ahmed H.
    Khattab, Mohammed
    Hosny, Kareem A.
    Elshazly, Mostafa
    Eldin, Ayman Salah
    Hosny, Adel
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 24 : 401 - 406
  • [5] The care of donors and recipients in adult living donor liver transplantation
    Hendrickse, A.
    Ko, J.
    Sakai, T.
    BJA EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (10) : 387 - 395
  • [6] Living donor liver transplantation. Selection of liver donors and recipients; results
    Braun, F.
    Gerken, G.
    Broering, D. C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGE, 2009, 4 (06): : 516 - 525
  • [7] Robotic surgery in living liver donors and liver recipients
    Semash, Konstantin
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 7 (03): : 123 - 127
  • [8] Remote ischemic preconditioning promotes early liver cell proliferation in a rat model of small-for-size liver transplantation
    Wang, Meng
    Shen, Jian
    Feng, Bing
    Gui, Liang
    Chen, Qi
    Zhang, Bin
    Tang, Jincao
    Li, Xiangcheng
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 179 (01) : E245 - E253
  • [9] Effect of remote ischemic preConditioning on liver injury in patients undergoing liver resection: the ERIC-LIVER trial
    Teo, Jin Yao
    Ho, Andrew F. W.
    Bulluck, Heerajnarain
    Gao, Fei
    Chong, Jun
    Koh, Ye Xin
    Tan, Ek Khoon
    Latiff, Julianah B. Abdul
    Chua, Siew H.
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    Chan, Chung Yip
    Chung, Alexander Y. F.
    Lee, Ser Yee
    Cheow, Peng Chung
    Ooi, London L. P. J.
    Davidson, Brian R.
    Jevaraj, Prema Raj
    Hausenloy, Derek J.
    HPB, 2020, 22 (09) : 1250 - 1257
  • [10] Comparison of hepatoprotective effect from ischemia-reperfusion injury of remote ischemic preconditioning of the liver vs local ischemic preconditioning of the liver during human liver resections
    Rakic, Mislav
    Patrlj, Leonardo
    Amic, Fedor
    Aralica, Gorana
    Grgurevic, Ivica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 54 : 248 - 253