The Socioeconomic Status of Donors and Recipients of Living Unrelated Renal Transplants in the United States

被引:12
|
作者
Gore, John L. [1 ]
Singer, Jennifer S. [2 ]
Brown, Arleen F. [3 ,4 ]
Danovitch, Gabriel M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
kidney; kidney transplantation; living donors; socioeconomic factors; health services accessibility; LIVE-KIDNEY DONOR; GUIDELINES; DONATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.112
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated unrelated living kidney donation in the United States and examined the characteristics of unrelated donor-recipient pairs. Materials and Methods: We accessed United Network for Organ Sharing files to identify adult living donor renal transplant recipients who received a transplant between 1997 and 2007. We evaluated factors associated with unrelated donation and compared a composite index of the socioeconomic characteristics of donor and recipient ZIP Codes between living unrelated and living related renal transplantation pairs. Spousal pairs were categorized as living related. Results: Of 39,168 adult renal transplant recipients 19% underwent living unrelated renal transplantation. These recipients were more likely white (vs black, Hispanic and other race OR 0.77-0.82, p < 0.05) and more highly educated (college vs less than high school OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.77), and more commonly received care at high volume transplant centers (vs lowest volume centers OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.95). Living unrelated renal transplantation recipients and donors lived in higher socioeconomic status index ZIP Codes than living related recipients (mean +/- SD recipients and donors 0.62 +/- 3.74 and 0.44 +/- 3.63 vs 0.03 +/- 3.85 and 0.10 +/- 3.87, respectively, each p < 0.001). Conclusions: Living unrelated renal transplantation donors and recipients are generally of higher socioeconomic status than their living related renal transplantation counterparts. There is restricted access to unrelated donors among underserved populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1760 / 1765
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States
    Dew, M. A.
    Jacobs, C. L.
    Jowsey, S. G.
    Hanto, R.
    Miller, C.
    Delmonico, F. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (05) : 1047 - 1054
  • [2] Income of Living Kidney Donors and the Income Difference Between Living Kidney Donors and Their Recipients in the United States
    Gill, J. S.
    Gill, J.
    Barnieh, L.
    Dong, J.
    Rose, C.
    Johnston, O.
    Tonelli, M.
    Klarenbach, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (11) : 3111 - 3118
  • [3] Living renal donor allograft lithiasis: A review of stone related morbidity in donors and recipients
    Strang, Andrew M.
    Lockhart, Mark E.
    Amling, Christopher L.
    Kolettis, Peter N.
    Burns, John R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03) : 832 - 836
  • [4] Protecting Donors and Safeguarding Altruism in the United States: The Living Donor Protection Act
    Wiseman, Alexander C.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 13 (05): : 790 - 792
  • [5] Solid-organ Transplants From Living Donors: Cumulative United States Experience on 140,156 Living Donor Transplants Over 28 Years
    Gruessner, R. W. G.
    Gruessner, A. C.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) : 3025 - 3035
  • [6] Survival among renal allograft recipients from non related living donors
    Carolina Carmona, R.
    Pablo Huidobro, Juan E.
    Jorge Vega, S.
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2015, 143 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [7] Return on investment for financial assistance for living kidney donors in the United States
    Mathur, Amit K.
    Xing, Jiawei
    Dickinson, David M.
    Warren, Patricia H.
    Gifford, Kimberly A.
    Hong, Barry A.
    Ojo, Akinlolu
    Merion, Robert M.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 32 (07)
  • [8] Effect of renal function on homeostasis of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): studies in donors and recipients of renal transplants
    M. Yusof Said
    Rianne M. Douwes
    Marco van Londen
    Isidor Minović
    Anne-Roos Frenay
    Martin H. de Borst
    Else van den Berg
    M. Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema
    Arslan Arinc Kayacelebi
    Alexander Bollenbach
    Harry van Goor
    Gerjan Navis
    Dimitrios Tsikas
    Stephan J. L. Bakker
    Amino Acids, 2019, 51 : 565 - 575
  • [9] Effect of renal function on homeostasis of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): studies in donors and recipients of renal transplants
    Said, M. Yusof
    Douwes, Rianne M.
    van Londen, Marco
    Minovic, Isidor
    Frenay, Anne-Roos
    de Borst, Martin H.
    van den Berg, Else
    Heiner-Fokkema, M. Rebecca
    Kayacelebi, Arslan Arinc
    Bollenbach, Alexander
    van Goor, Harry
    Navis, Gerjan
    Tsikas, Dimitrios
    Bakker, Stephan J. L.
    AMINO ACIDS, 2019, 51 (03) : 565 - 575
  • [10] Telomere Length of Recipients and Living Kidney Donors and Chronic Graft Dysfunction in Kidney Transplants
    Oetting, William S.
    Guan, Weihua
    Schladt, David P.
    Wildebush, Winston A.
    Becker, Jennifer
    Thyagarajan, Bharat
    Jacobson, Pamala A.
    Matas, Arthur J.
    Israni, Ajay K.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (03) : 325 - 329