A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (APCDs)

被引:101
作者
Li, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jianglong [5 ]
Liu, Yangxian [1 ]
Huang, Renkun [2 ]
Wang, Zhihua [4 ]
Zhao, Yongchun [3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Ningde Normal Univ, Fujian Prov Key Lab Featured Biochem & Chem Mat, Ningde City, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Utilizat, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Monash Univ, Monash Suzhou Res Inst MSRI & Southeast Univ Mons, Suzhou 215000, Peoples R China
关键词
Mercury removal; APCDs; SCR catalysts; WFGDs; Hg (0) rerelease; Dust removal devices; FIRED POWER-PLANTS; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; MODIFIED SCR CATALYST; IRON-BASED SORBENTS; HG-0; OXIDATION; COAL-COMBUSTION; HYDROCHLORIC-ACID; SIMULTANEOUS NO; FUEL GAS; DESULFURIZATION LIQUORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mercury is a highly toxic heavy metal pollutant. It is of great significance to develop cost-effective mercury pollution control technologies of coal-fired flue gas. Among various mercury from flue gas removal methods, the application of existing air pollution control devices (APCDs) to remove mercury from flue gas is one of the most valuable methods because it doesn't need to install additional mercury removal equipment, reducing the cost of mercury removal. This review summarizes the recent progress of mercury from flue gas removal by APCDs (e.g., SCR denitration device, WFGD system and dust removal device). SCR denitration device can achieve partial removal of mercury in flue gas through combined with WFGD system, but easy inactivation and poor sulfur/ water/heavy metals resistance of SCR catalyzers are still the main problems. WFGD systems can remove most of Hg2+ (80%-95%), but have low treatment ability for Hg-0. Various oxidants can effectively oxidize Hg-0 into Hg2+. However, traditional oxidants have high prices and secondary pollution due to the formation of byproducts. Fabric filters (FFs), electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and hybrid fabric filters (HFs) can all control the emission of mercury in the flue gas to a certain extent, especially can effectively remove most of HgP and part of Hg2+, but has low removal capacity for Hg-0. Compared with ESP, FF has better capture efficiency for Hg2+ and Hg-0, and a combination of ESP and FF, that is HF, can effectively improve the mercury removal capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 235 条
  • [1] Mechanism-Performance Relationships of Metal Oxides in Catalyzed HCl Oxidation
    Amrute, Amol P.
    Mondelli, Cecilia
    Hevia, Miguel A. G.
    Perez-Ramirez, Javier
    [J]. ACS CATALYSIS, 2011, 1 (06): : 583 - 590
  • [2] Meeting Minamata: Cost-effective compliance options for atmospheric mercury control in Chinese coal-fired power plants
    Ancora, Maria Pia
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Schreifels, Jeremy J.
    Hao, Jiming
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 88 : 485 - 494
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, Enhanced Control of Mercury by Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems Site 1 Results
  • [4] Degradation of Methyl Red using Fenton's reagent and the effect of various salts
    Ashraf, SS
    Rauf, MA
    Alhadrami, S
    [J]. DYES AND PIGMENTS, 2006, 69 (1-2) : 74 - 78
  • [5] Experimental Study on Demercurization Performance of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System
    Bao Jingjing
    Yang Linjun
    Yan Jinpei
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2009, 27 (11) : 2242 - 2248
  • [6] Use of membrane collectors in electrostatic precipitators
    Bayless, DJ
    Pasic, H
    Alam, MK
    Shi, LM
    Haynes, B
    Cochran, J
    Khan, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2001, 51 (10): : 1401 - 1407
  • [7] Blythe G.M., 2001, Enhanced Control of Mercury by Wet Flue Gas Desulfurizations Site 3 Topical Report
  • [8] Botros P., 2021, ENHANCED CONTROL MER
  • [9] Lignites and subbituminous coals combustion in Polish power plants as a source of anthropogenic mercury emission
    Burmistrz, Piotr
    Kogut, Krzysztof
    Marczak, Marta
    Zwozdziak, Jerzy
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 152 : 250 - 258
  • [10] Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber
    Chang, JCS
    Ghorishi, SB
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (24) : 5763 - 5766