Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction

被引:33
作者
Butler, Nick [1 ]
Collins, Stuart [1 ]
Memon, Breda [1 ]
Memon, Muhammed Ashraf [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ipswich Hosp, Dept Surg, Ipswich, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Bolton Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bolton, Lancs, England
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 07期
关键词
Oesophagectomy; Laparoscopy; Oesophageal cancer; Retrospective studies; Prospective studies; Comparative studies; Patient outcome; Intraoperative complications; Postoperative complications; Hospitalisation; Human; LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; INTRATHORACIC ANASTOMOSIS; CERVICAL ACCESS; PRONE POSITION; CANCER; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES; MOBILIZATION; ESOPHAGUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Oesophagectomy is one of the most challenging surgeries. Potential for morbidity and mortality is high. Minimally invasive techniques have been introduced in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications and recovery times. Debate continues over whether these techniques are beneficial to morbidity and whether oncological resection is compromised. This review article will analyse the different techniques employed in minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) and critically evaluate commonly reported outcome measures from the available literature. Methods Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and PubMed databases were used to search English language articles published on MIO. Thirty-one articles underwent thorough analysis and the data were tabulated where appropriate. To date, only level III evidence exists. Where appropriate, comparisons are made with a meta-analysis on open oesophagectomy. Results Positive aspects of MIO include at least comparable postoperative recovery data and oncological resection measures to open surgery. Intensive care unit requirements are lower, as is duration of inpatient stay. Respiratory morbidity varies. Negative aspects include increased technical skill of the surgeon and increased equipment requirements, increased operative time and limitation with respect to local advancement of cancer. With increasing individual experience, improvements in outcome measures and the amenability of this approach to increasing neoplastic advancement has been shown. Conclusion MIO has outcome measures at least as comparable to open oesophagectomy in the setting of benign and nonlocally advanced cancer. Transthoracic oesophagectomy provides superior exposure to the thoracic oesophagus compared to the transhiatal approach and is currently preferred. No multicentre randomised controlled trials exist or are likely to come into fruition. As with all surgery, careful patient selection is required for optimal results from MIO.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2083
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] LIGATURE VERSUS PURSE STRING FOR SURGICAL STAPLED ANASTOMOSES
    ALLSOP, JR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 62 (09): : 740 - 742
  • [2] [Anonymous], ENDOSURGERY
  • [3] Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Avital, S
    Zundel, N
    Szomstein, S
    Rosenthal, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (01) : 69 - 74
  • [4] Bann Simon, 2005, JSLS, V9, P376
  • [5] Short-term outcomes following total minimlly invasive oesophagectomy
    Berrisford, R. G.
    Wajed, S. A.
    Sanders, D.
    Rucklidge, M. W. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (05) : 602 - 610
  • [6] Minimally invasive transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy
    Boettger, T.
    Terzic, A.
    Mueller, M.
    Rodehorst, A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (10): : 1695 - 1700
  • [7] Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival
    Braghetto, I.
    Csendes, A.
    Cardemil, G.
    Burdiles, P.
    Korn, O.
    Valladares, H.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (11): : 1681 - 1686
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A comparative study
    Bresadola, Vittorio
    Terrosu, Giovanni
    Cojutti, Alessandro
    Benzoni, Enrico
    Baracchini, Elena
    Bresadola, Fabrizio
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (02) : 63 - 67
  • [9] Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Collins, G
    Johnson, E
    Kroshus, T
    Ganz, R
    Batts, K
    Seng, J
    Nwaneri, O
    Dunn, D
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (02): : 298 - 301
  • [10] Totally laparoscopic transhiatal esophago-gastrectomy without thoracic or cervical access -: The least invasive surgery for adenocarcinoma of the cardia?
    Costi, R
    Himpens, J
    Bruyns, J
    Cadière, GB
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (04): : 629 - 632