Synthetic controls with staggered adoption

被引:51
作者
Ben-Michael, Eli [1 ]
Feller, Avi [2 ]
Rothstein, Jesse [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
causal inference; panel data; synthetic control method; TEACHERS UNIONS; INFERENCE; CRIME;
D O I
10.1111/rssb.12448
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Staggered adoption of policies by different units at different times creates promising opportunities for observational causal inference. Estimation remains challenging, however, and common regression methods can give misleading results. A promising alternative is the synthetic control method (SCM), which finds a weighted average of control units that closely balances the treated unit's pre-treatment outcomes. In this paper, we generalize SCM, originally designed to study a single treated unit, to the staggered adoption setting. We first bound the error for the average effect and show that it depends on both the imbalance for each treated unit separately and the imbalance for the average of the treated units. We then propose 'partially pooled' SCM weights to minimize a weighted combination of these measures; approaches that focus only on balancing one of the two components can lead to bias. We extend this approach to incorporate unit-level intercept shifts and auxiliary covariates. We assess the performance of the proposed method via extensive simulations and apply our results to the question of whether teacher collective bargaining leads to higher school spending, finding minimal impacts. We implement the proposed method in the augsynth R package.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 381
页数:31
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]   Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects [J].
Abadie, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2021, 59 (02) :391-425
[3]   Robust Post-Matching Inference [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Spiess, Jann .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 117 (538) :983-995
[4]   Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Diamond, Alexis ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (02) :495-510
[5]   Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Diamond, Alexis ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (490) :493-505
[6]   The nonparametric identification of treatment effects in duration models [J].
Abbring, JH ;
Van den Berg, GJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (05) :1491-1517
[7]  
Arkhangelsky D., 2019, SYNTHETIC DIFFERENCE, DOI DOI 10.3386/W25532
[8]   Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2022, 226 (01) :62-79
[9]   Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Bayati, Mohsen ;
Doudchenko, Nikolay ;
Imbens, Guido ;
Khosravi, Khashayar .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 116 (536) :1716-1730
[10]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48