The vertical nature of dominance-submission: Individual differences in vertical attention

被引:21
作者
Robinson, Michael D. [1 ]
Zabelina, Darya L. [1 ]
Ode, Scott [1 ]
Moeller, Sara K. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Psychol, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
metaphor; verticality; personality; dominance; submission; attention;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dominance-submission has been linked to verticality in studies of metaphor, judgment, and online processing. In all cases, dominance has been associated with higher locations in vertical space, whereas submission has been associated with lower locations in vertical space. The present studies sought to extend this class of vertical metaphors to individual differences in spatial attention. Two studies were conducted. In both, dominance-submission was assessed as an individual difference variable and covert spatial attention tasks were used to assess biases in vertical selective attention. As predicted, dominant individuals were faster to respond to higher spatial probes, whereas submissive individuals were faster to respond to lower spatial probes. These results reinforce a vertical theory of dominance-submission, importantly extending it to individual differences and basic processes of selective attention. Findings are discussed in relation to theories of embodiment, metaphor, personality, and attention. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 948
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Individual Differences in Driver Inattention: The Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale [J].
Ledesma, Ruben D. ;
Montes, Silvana A. ;
Poo, Fernando M. ;
Lopez-Ramon, Maria F. .
TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 11 (02) :142-150
[42]   Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students’ approaches to learning [J].
Eva Kyndt ;
Eduardo Cascallar ;
Filip Dochy .
Higher Education, 2012, 64 :285-297
[43]   Individual Differences & Task Attention in Cybersickness: A Call for a Standardized Approach to Data Sharing [J].
Gilbert, Stephen B. ;
Jasper, Angelica ;
Sepich, Nathan C. ;
Doty, Taylor A. ;
Kelly, Jonathan W. ;
Dorneich, Michael C. .
2021 IEEE CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY AND 3D USER INTERFACES ABSTRACTS AND WORKSHOPS (VRW 2021), 2021, :161-164
[44]   Human nature and personality variation: Reconnecting evolutionary psychology with the science of individual differences [J].
Maestripieri, Dario ;
Boutwell, Brian B. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 143
[45]   Individual differences in attention allocation during a two-dimensional inhibitory control task [J].
Weichart, Emily R. ;
Sederberg, Per B. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2021, 83 (02) :676-684
[46]   Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction [J].
Broadway, James M. ;
Engle, Randall W. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2011, 137 (01) :115-126
[47]   Individual differences in executive attention and inhibitory control are related to spatial memory biases in adults [J].
Schutte, Anne R. ;
Wu, Yinbo ;
Jacoby, Morgan N. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (02) :391-403
[48]   Cueing of visual attention by emotional facial expressions: The influence of individual differences in anxiety and depression [J].
Koster, Ernst H. W. ;
Leyman, Lemke ;
De Raedt, Rudi ;
Crombez, Geert .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 41 (02) :329-339
[49]   Understanding Lateral and Vertical Biases in Consumer Attention: An In-Store Ambulatory Eye-Tracking Study [J].
Chen, Ming ;
Burke, Raymond R. ;
Hui, Sam K. ;
Leykin, Alex .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2021, 58 (06) :1120-1141
[50]   Emotion and attention interaction: a trade-off between stimuli relevance, motivation and individual differences [J].
Oliveira, Leticia ;
Mocaiber, Izabela ;
David, Isabel A. ;
Erthal, Fatima ;
Volchan, Eliane ;
Pereira, Mirtes G. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7