The vertical nature of dominance-submission: Individual differences in vertical attention

被引：21

作者：

Robinson, Michael D. ^{[1
]}

Zabelina, Darya L. ^{[1
]}

Ode, Scott ^{[1
]}

Moeller, Sara K. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Psychol, Fargo, ND 58105 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY | 2008年 / 42卷 / 04期

关键词：

metaphor; verticality; personality; dominance; submission; attention;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.002

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Dominance-submission has been linked to verticality in studies of metaphor, judgment, and online processing. In all cases, dominance has been associated with higher locations in vertical space, whereas submission has been associated with lower locations in vertical space. The present studies sought to extend this class of vertical metaphors to individual differences in spatial attention. Two studies were conducted. In both, dominance-submission was assessed as an individual difference variable and covert spatial attention tasks were used to assess biases in vertical selective attention. As predicted, dominant individuals were faster to respond to higher spatial probes, whereas submissive individuals were faster to respond to lower spatial probes. These results reinforce a vertical theory of dominance-submission, importantly extending it to individual differences and basic processes of selective attention. Findings are discussed in relation to theories of embodiment, metaphor, personality, and attention. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：933 / 948

页数：16

共 50 条

[31] Polymorphisms in Dopamine System Genes Are Associated With Individual Differences in Attention in Infancy [J].

Holmboe, Karla ;

Nemoda, Zsofia ;

Fearon, R. M. Pasco ;

Csibra, Gergely ;

Sasvari-Szekely, Maria ;

Johnson, Mark H. .

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (02) :404-416

[32] Gender and individual differences in cueing effects: Visuospatial attention and object likability [J].

Mitsuda, Takashi ;

Otani, Mio ;

Sugimoto, Sayana .

ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2019, 81 (06) :1890-1900

[33] Predictors of individual differences in attention among low birth weight children [J].

Robson, AL ;

Pederson, DR .

JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 1997, 18 (01) :13-21

[34] Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention From brain mechanisms to individual differences in efficiency [J].

Rosario Rueda, M. ;

Pozuelos, Joan P. ;

Combita, Lina M. .

AIMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 2 (04) :183-202

[35] Gender and individual differences in cueing effects: Visuospatial attention and object likability [J].

Takashi Mitsuda ;

Mio Otani ;

Sayana Sugimoto .

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2019, 81 :1890-1900

[36] Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces [J].

Valuch, Christian ;

Pflueger, Lena S. ;

Wallner, Bernard ;

Laeng, Bruno ;

Ansorge, Ulrich .

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6

[37] Neural correlates of covert orienting of visual spatial attention along vertical and horizontal dimensions [J].

Mao, Lihua ;

Zhou, Bin ;

Zhou, Wu ;

Han, Shihui .

BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1136 (01) :142-153

[38] Mounting behaviour in finishing pigs: Stable individual differences are not due to dominance or stage of sexual development [J].

Hintze, Sara ;

Scott, Desiree ;

Turner, Simon ;

Meddle, Simone L. ;

D'Eath, Richard B. .

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2013, 147 (1-2) :69-80

[39] Measuring individual differences in internal versus external attention: The attentional style questionnaire [J].

Van Calster, Laurens ;

D'Argembeau, Arnaud ;

Majerus, Steve .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 128 :25-32

[40] Individual Differences in Infant Fixation Duration Relate to Attention and Behavioral Control in Childhood [J].

Papageorgiou, Kostas A. ;

Smith, Tim J. ;

Wu, Rachel ;

Johnson, Mark H. ;

Kirkham, Natasha Z. ;

Ronald, Angelica .

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (07) :1371-1379

← 1 2 3 4 5 →