The vertical nature of dominance-submission: Individual differences in vertical attention

被引:21
作者
Robinson, Michael D. [1 ]
Zabelina, Darya L. [1 ]
Ode, Scott [1 ]
Moeller, Sara K. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Psychol, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
metaphor; verticality; personality; dominance; submission; attention;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dominance-submission has been linked to verticality in studies of metaphor, judgment, and online processing. In all cases, dominance has been associated with higher locations in vertical space, whereas submission has been associated with lower locations in vertical space. The present studies sought to extend this class of vertical metaphors to individual differences in spatial attention. Two studies were conducted. In both, dominance-submission was assessed as an individual difference variable and covert spatial attention tasks were used to assess biases in vertical selective attention. As predicted, dominant individuals were faster to respond to higher spatial probes, whereas submissive individuals were faster to respond to lower spatial probes. These results reinforce a vertical theory of dominance-submission, importantly extending it to individual differences and basic processes of selective attention. Findings are discussed in relation to theories of embodiment, metaphor, personality, and attention. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 948
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill [J].
Burgoon, JK ;
Dunbar, NE .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2000, 67 (01) :96-121
[2]   Are Individual Differences in Absentmindedness Correlated with Individual Differences in Attention? [J].
Ishigami, Yoko ;
Klein, Raymond M. .
JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 30 (04) :220-237
[3]   Individual Differences in the Intensity and Consistency of Attention [J].
Unsworth, Nash ;
Miller, Ashley L. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (05) :391-400
[4]   Individual differences in implicit attention to phonetic detail in speech perception [J].
Lewandowski, Natalie ;
Duran, Daniel .
INTERSPEECH 2019, 2019, :2255-2259
[5]   VERTICAL LOVE Forms of Submission and Top-Down Power in Orthodox Ethiopia [J].
Malara, Diego Maria ;
Boylston, Tom .
SOCIAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 60 (04) :40-57
[6]   INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MEMORY-GUIDED ATTENTION [J].
Mo, Shimin ;
Fischer, Manda ;
Moscovitch, Morris ;
Alain, Claude .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 :S119-S119
[7]   Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences [J].
Frischen, Alexandra ;
Bayliss, Andrew P. ;
Tipper, Steven P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (04) :694-724
[8]   Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance [J].
Watkins, Christopher D. ;
Jones, Benedict C. ;
DeBruine, Lisa M. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2010, 49 (08) :967-971
[9]   Does "feeling down" mean seeing down? Depressive symptoms and vertical selective attention [J].
Meier, BP ;
Robinson, MD .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (04) :451-461
[10]   Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students' approaches to learning [J].
Kyndt, Eva ;
Cascallar, Eduardo ;
Dochy, Filip .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 64 (03) :285-297