The Practice of Innovating Research Methods

被引:41
作者
Le, Jane Kirsten [1 ]
Schmid, Torsten [2 ]
机构
[1] WHU, Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Strateg Management, Vallendar, Germany
[2] Univ St Gallen, Inst Management, St Gallen, Switzerland
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
qualitative research methods; review; innovation; research practice; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; ISSUE; WORK;
D O I
10.1177/1094428120935498
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine how scholars innovate research methods. Based on a review of published qualitative strategy and management research, we identify highly innovative academic papers, that is, papers that demonstrate substantial novelty in every part of the research process. We work through these papers in detail to demonstrate their novelty, highlighting concrete ways in which scholars have innovated three interconnected parts of the research process: data generation, data analysis, and presentation of findings. Based on our analysis, we develop a two-layered "iceberg" model of method innovation, which shows that important principles guide the innovative use of organizational research tools. These principles are engaging in holistic innovation, being excruciatingly clear in the presentation of methods, developing theory and method together, and being reflexive in innovating methods. Our model demystifies the largely implicit process of innovating research methods. We hope it serves to orient and encourage a more creative use of methods in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 336
页数:29
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review
    Acar, Oguz A.
    Tarakci, Murat
    van Knippenberg, Daan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (01) : 96 - 121
  • [2] The philosophy and politics of quality in qualitative organizational research
    Amis, John M.
    Silk, Michael L.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 11 (03) : 456 - 480
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, INTRO QUALITATIVE RE
  • [4] History-informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship
    Argyres, Nicholas S.
    De Massis, Alfredo
    Foss, Nicolai J.
    Frattini, Federico
    Jones, Geoffrey
    Silverman, Brian S.
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (03) : 343 - 368
  • [5] Plowman DA, 2007, ACAD MANAGE J, V50, P515, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525647
  • [6] Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking
    Balogun, J
    Johnson, G
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (04) : 523 - 549
  • [7] NEW WAYS OF SEEING THROUGH QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
    Bansal, Pratima
    Smith, Wendy K.
    Vaara, Eero
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 61 (04) : 1189 - 1195
  • [8] Bartunek JM, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P9
  • [9] Berelson B., 1952, Content analysis in communication research. p, P220
  • [10] The Transparency Paradox: A Role for Privacy in Organizational Learning and Operational Control
    Bernstein, Ethan S.
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2012, 57 (02) : 181 - 216