Internal Rotation Stress Testing Improves Radiographic Outcomes of Type 3 Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

被引:19
作者
Bauer, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Stutz, Christopher M. [2 ]
Schoenecker, Jonathan G. [1 ]
Lovejoy, Steven A. [1 ]
Mencio, Gregory A. [1 ]
Martus, Jeffrey E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Monroe Carell Jr Childrens Hosp, Pediat Orthopaed Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Texas Scottish Rite Hosp Children, Pediat Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX 75219 USA
关键词
supracondylar humerus fracture; internal rotation stress test; mini-open medial pin approach; ENTRY PIN FIXATION; ULNAR NERVE INJURY; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; CROSSED-PIN; CHILDREN; PLACEMENT; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0000000000000914
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if routine use of an intraoperative internal rotation stress test (IRST) for type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures will safely improve maintenance of reduction. Methods: An intraoperative protocol for type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures was adopted at our institution, consisting of fracture reduction, placement of 2 laterally based divergent pins, and then an IRST to determine the need for additional fixation with a medial column pin placed through a small open approach. Fractures treated with the prospective IRST protocol were compared with a retrospective cohort before adoption of the protocol (pre-IRST). The primary outcomes were differences in Baumann's angle, lateral humerocapitellar angle, and the rotation index between final intraoperative fluoroscopic images and radiographs at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes were complications such as iatrogenic nerve injury, loss of fixation, or need for reoperation. Results: There were 78 fractures in the retrospective cohort (pre-IRST) and 49 in the prospective cohort (IRST). Overall rotational loss of reduction (>6%), measured by lateral rotation percentage, and major rotational loss of reduction (>12%) were less common in the IRST cohort (6/49 vs. 27/78, P=0.007 overall; 0/49 vs. 8/78, P=0.02 major loss). There were no major losses of reduction for Baumann's angle (>12 degrees) in either cohort. There were 5 subjects in the pre-IRST cohort (6.4%) with a major loss of reduction of the humerocapitellar angle (>12 degrees) and none in the IRST cohort (P=0.16) Loss of proximal fixation with need for reoperation occurred in 3 fractures in the pre-IRST cohort, and none in the IRST cohort (P=0.28). There were no postoperative nerve injuries in either group. Conclusions: Intraoperative IRST after placement of 2 lateral pins assists with the decision for additional fixation in type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures. This method improved the final radiographic rotational alignment, and was safely performed using a mini-open approach for medial pin placement.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2011, PEDIAT SUPR HUM FRAC
[2]   Nerve Injuries Associated With Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: A Meta-analysis [J].
Babal, Jessica C. ;
Mehlman, Charles T. ;
Klein, Guy .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 30 (03) :253-263
[3]   Complications After Pinning of Supracondylar Distal Humerus Fractures [J].
Bashyal, Ravi K. ;
Chu, Jennifer Y. ;
Schoenecker, Perry L. ;
Dobbs, Matthew B. ;
Luhmann, Scott J. ;
Gordon, J. Eric .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 29 (07) :704-708
[4]   Treatment of Displaced Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Patterns Requiring Medial Fixation: A Reliable and Safer Cross-pinning Technique [J].
Edmonds, Eric W. ;
Roocroft, Joanna H. ;
Mubarak, Scott J. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 32 (04) :346-351
[5]   Fracture stability after pinning of displaced supracondylar distal humerus fractures in children [J].
Gordon, JE ;
Patton, CM ;
Luhmann, SJ ;
Bassett, GS ;
Schoenecker, PL .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2001, 21 (03) :313-318
[6]   Biomechanical Analysis of Pin Placement for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Does Starting Point, Pin Size, and Number Matter? [J].
Gottschalk, Hilton Phillip ;
Sagoo, Daljeet ;
Glaser, Diana ;
Doan, Josh ;
Edmonds, Eric W. ;
Schlechter, John .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 32 (05) :445-451
[7]   Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini-open technique [J].
Green, DW ;
Widmann, RF ;
Frank, JS ;
Gardner, MJ .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2005, 19 (03) :158-163
[8]  
Houshian S, 2001, J Orthop Sci, V6, P312, DOI 10.1007/s007760100024
[9]   Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children - A Randomized clinical trial [J].
Kocher, Mininder S. ;
Kasser, James R. ;
Waters, Peter M. ;
Bae, Donald ;
Snyder, Brian D. ;
Hresko, M. Timothy ;
Hedequist, Daniel ;
Karlin, Lawrence ;
Kim, Young-Jo ;
Murray, Martha M. ;
Millis, Michael B. ;
Emans, John B. ;
Dichtel, Laura ;
Matheney, Travis ;
Lee, Ben M. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :706-712
[10]   Biomechanical analysis of pinning techniques for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures [J].
Larson, Loren ;
Firoozbakhsh, Keikhosrow ;
Passarelli, Ralph ;
Bosch, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 26 (05) :573-578