Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome

被引:43
作者
Ay, Saime [1 ,2 ]
Dogan, Sebnem Koldas [2 ]
Evcik, Deniz [2 ]
Baser, Ozgun Cakmak [2 ]
机构
[1] Ufuk Univ, Dr Ridvan Ege Hastanesi, Tip Fak, TR-06520 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ufuk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-06520 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Myofascial pain syndrome; Phonophoresis; Ultrasound; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-010-1419-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of phonophoresis, ultrasound and placebo ultrasound therapies in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). This is a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. Sixty patients (48 women, 12 men, mean age 37.9 +/- A 12.2 years) with MPS were included in this study. Patients were allocated into three groups. Group 1(n = 20) was received diclofenac phonophoresis, group 2(n = 20) was received ultrasound and group 3(n = 20) was received placebo ultrasound therapies over trigger points, 10 min a day for 15 session during 3 weeks (1 MHz-1,5 watt/cm(2)). Additionally, all patients were given neck exercise program including isotonic, isometric and stretching. Patients were assessed by means of pain, range of motion (ROM) of neck, number of trigger points (NTP), algometric measurement and disability. Pain severity was measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and Likert scale. The neck pain disability index (NPDI) was used for assessing disability. Measurements were taken before and after treatment. After treatment, there were statistically significant improvements in pain severity, NTP, pressure pain threshold (PPT), ROM and NPDI scores both in phonophoresis and in ultrasound therapy groups (P < 0.05). Statistically significant increase in cervical lateral flexion and rotation was observed in the placebo US group. While there was no statistically significant improvement in the cervical flexion-extension joint movement, pain levels, number of trigger points and NPDI score, pressure pain threshold (P > 0.05), also there were no significant differences in all parameters between group 1 and 2 (P = 0.05). Both diclofenac phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy were effective in the treatment of patients with MPS. Phonophoresis was not found to be superior over ultrasound therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1208
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHYS MED REHABILITAT
[2]  
Basford JR., 2005, PHYS MED REHABILITAT, P251
[3]   Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale [J].
Bicer, A ;
Yazici, A ;
Camdeviren, H ;
Erdogan, C .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (16) :959-962
[4]  
BYLNN, 1995, PHYS THER, V75, P539
[5]   Regional myofascial pain: diagnosis and management [J].
Cummings, Mike ;
Baldry, Peter .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :367-387
[6]   Treatment of myofascial pain [J].
Esenyel, M ;
Caglar, N ;
Aldemir, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2000, 79 (01) :48-52
[7]   Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise - a randomised controlled trial [J].
Gam, AN ;
Warming, S ;
Larsen, LH ;
Jensen, B ;
Hoydalsmo, O ;
Allon, I ;
Andersen, B ;
Gotzsche, NE ;
Petersen, M ;
Mathiesen, B .
PAIN, 1998, 77 (01) :73-79
[8]   Is there evidence that phonophoresis is more effective than ultrasound in treating pain associated with lateral epicondylitis? [J].
Hoppenrath, T ;
Ciccone, CD .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (01) :136-140
[9]   Effects of ultrasound and diclofenac phonophoresis on inflammatory pain relief: Suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in arthritic rats [J].
Hsieh, YL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (01) :39-49
[10]   Phonophoresis versus ultrasound in the treatment of common musculoskeletal conditions [J].
Klaiman, MD ;
Shrader, JA ;
Danoff, JV ;
Hicks, JE ;
Pesce, WJ ;
Ferland, J .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1998, 30 (09) :1349-1355