Corporatization in the Public Sector: Explaining the Growth of Local Government Companies

被引:79
作者
Andrews, Rhys [1 ]
Ferry, Laurence [2 ]
Skelcher, Chris [3 ]
Wegorowski, Piotr [4 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Accounting, Durham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Inst Local Govt Studies, Publ Governance, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Language Commun Res, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP; MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISES; TRANSACTION COSTS; SERVICE DELIVERY; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; COMPETITION; EFFICIENCY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/puar.13052
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The creation of companies by local governments to provide public services-referred to as "corporatization"-is an example of systemic public entrepreneurship that is popular across the world. To build knowledge of the antecedents of public sector entrepreneurship, the authors investigate the factors that lead local governments to create companies for public service delivery. Using zero-inflated negative binomial regressions to analyze secondary data from 150 major English local governments for 2010-16, the authors find that governments with higher levels of grant dependence and debt dependence are more involved in the creation and operation of companies, as are larger governments. Further analysis reveals that very low and very high managerial capabilities are strongly associated with more involvement in profit-making companies, while local government involvement in companies is more prevalent in deprived areas. At the same time, government ownership of companies is more common in areas with high economic output.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 493
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] INSTITUTIONAL, IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL INFLUENCES ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM ENGLAND
    Alonso, Jose Manuel
    Andrews, Rhys
    Hodgkinson, Ian R.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 94 (01) : 244 - 262
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, Contingency theory
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, PUBLIC ORGAN REV, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11115-013-0235-X
  • [4] Arapis T., 2013, J PUBLIC BUDG ACCOUN, V25, P446, DOI [10.1108/JPBAFM-25-03-2013-B004, DOI 10.1108/JPBAFM-25-03-2013-B004]
  • [5] Babbidge Adrian Rosemary, 2006, MOVING MUSEUM TRUSTS
  • [6] The changing nature of public entrepreneurship
    Bernier, Luc
    Hafsi, Taieb
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (03) : 488 - 503
  • [7] Burdened by Bureaucracy? Determinants of Administrative Intensity in Public Organisations
    Boyne, George A.
    Meier, Kenneth J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 16 (02) : 307 - 327
  • [8] Does Public Service Performance Affect Top Management Turnover?
    Boyne, George A.
    James, Oliver
    John, Peter
    Petrovsky, Nicolai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2010, 20 : I261 - I279
  • [9] Reconciling Conflicting Policy Objectives in Public Contracting: The Enabling Role of Capabilities
    Cabral, Sandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2017, 54 (06) : 823 - 853
  • [10] Private Entrepreneurs in Public Services: A Longitudinal Examination of Outsourcing and Statization of Prisons
    Cabral, Sandro
    Lazzarini, Sergio G.
    De Azevedo, Paulo Furquim
    [J]. STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (01) : 6 - 25