Intergroup Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Tutorials for Undergraduate Pharmacy Students

被引:36
作者
Kritikos, Vicky S. [1 ]
Woulfe, Jim [1 ]
Sukkar, Maria B. [1 ]
Saini, Bandana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Pharm, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
pharmacy students; peer assessment; problem-based learning; EDUCATION; NEED;
D O I
10.5688/ajpe75473
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective. To develop, implement, and evaluate a process of intergroup peer assessment and feedback using problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials. Methods. A peer-assessment process was used in a PBL tutorial setting for an integrated pharmacy practice course in which small groups of students graded each others' PBL case presentations and provided feedback in conjunction with facilitator assessment. Assessment. Students' quantitative and qualitative perceptions of the peer assessment process were triangulated with facilitator feedback. Students became more engaged, confident, and motivated, and developed a range of self-directed, life-long learning skills. Students had mixed views regarding the fairness of the process and grade descriptors. Facilitators strongly supported the peer assessment process. Conclusions. Peer assessment is an appropriate method to assess PBL skills and is endorsed by students as appropriate and useful.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, 2006, ACCR STAND GUID PROF, DOI 10.5688/aj7006144 17332870
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260293990240401
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0260293990240405, 10.1080/0260293990240405]
[4]  
Ballantyne R., 2002, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, V27, P427, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302, DOI 10.1080/0260293022000009302]
[5]  
Beck DE, 2002, AM J PHARM EDUC, V66, P208
[6]  
Bloom B. S., 1956, TAXONOMY ED OBJECTIV
[7]   Preparing for a renaissance in pharmacy education: The need, opportunity, and capacity for change [J].
Blouin, Robert A. ;
Joyner, Pamela U. ;
Pollack, Gary M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 72 (02) :42
[8]  
Boud D, 1995, ENHANCING LEARNING T
[9]   Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise [J].
Cheng, WN ;
Warren, M .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1997, 22 (02) :233-239
[10]   The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review [J].
Dochy, F ;
Segers, M ;
Sluijsmans, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1999, 24 (03) :331-350