Multiple Imputation of Missing Phenotype Data for QTL Mapping

被引:9
|
作者
Bobb, Jennifer F. [1 ]
Scharfstein, Daniel O. [1 ]
Daniels, Michael J. [2 ]
Collins, Francis S. [3 ]
Kelada, Samir [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] NHGRI, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
来源
STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS IN GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY | 2011年 / 10卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
multiple imputation; missing data; quantitative trait loci; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; AIRWAY RESPONSIVENESS; COLLABORATIVE CROSS; SYSTEMS GENETICS; INCOMPLETE DATA; MOUSE; MICE; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; FRAMEWORK; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.2202/1544-6115.1676
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Missing phenotype data can be a major hurdle to mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL). Though in many cases experiments may be designed to minimize the occurrence of missing data, it is often unavoidable in practice; thus, statistical methods to account for missing data are needed. In this paper we describe an approach for conjoining multiple imputation and QTL mapping. Methods are applied to map genes associated with increased breathing effort in mice after lung inflammation due to allergen challenge in developing lines of the Collaborative Cross, a new mouse genetics resource. Missing data poses a particular challenge in this study because the desired phenotype summary to be mapped is a function of incompletely observed dose-response curves. Comparison of the multiple imputation approach to two naive approaches for handling missing data suggest that these simpler methods may yield poor results: ignoring missing data through a complete case analysis may lead to incorrect conclusions, while using a last observation carried forward procedure, which does not account for uncertainty in the imputed values, may lead to anti-conservative inference. The proposed approach is widely applicable to other studies with missing phenotype data.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple imputation of ordinal missing not at random data
    Hammon, Angelina
    ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 107 (04) : 671 - 692
  • [22] Multiple imputation of missing fMRI data in whole brain analysis
    Vaden, Kenneth I., Jr.
    Gebregziabher, Mulugeta
    Kuchinsky, Stefanie E.
    Eckert, Marl A.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 60 (03) : 1843 - 1855
  • [23] Handling Missing Values in Longitudinal Panel Data With Multiple Imputation
    Young, Rebekah
    Johnson, David R.
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2015, 77 (01) : 277 - 294
  • [24] A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies
    Md Hamidul Huque
    John B. Carlin
    Julie A. Simpson
    Katherine J. Lee
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [25] A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies
    Huque, Md Hamidul
    Carlin, John B.
    Simpson, Julie A.
    Lee, Katherine J.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [26] Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Fully Conditional Specification Versus Multivariate Normal Imputation
    Lee, Katherine J.
    Carlin, John B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 171 (05) : 624 - 632
  • [27] Multiple imputation of missing values
    Royston, Patrick
    STATA JOURNAL, 2004, 4 (03) : 227 - 241
  • [28] Mediation Analysis with Missing Data Through Multiple Imputation and Bootstrap
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    Wang, Lijuan
    Tong, Xin
    Quantitative Psychology Research, 2015, 140 : 341 - 355
  • [29] Auxiliary Variables in Multiple Imputation When Data Are Missing Not at Random
    Mustillo, Sarah
    Kwon, Soyoung
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (02) : 73 - 91
  • [30] Hot Deck Multiple Imputation for Handling Missing Accelerometer Data
    Nicole M. Butera
    Siying Li
    Kelly R. Evenson
    Chongzhi Di
    David M. Buchner
    Michael J. LaMonte
    Andrea Z. LaCroix
    Amy Herring
    Statistics in Biosciences, 2019, 11 : 422 - 448