Forceps and vacuum delivery: A survey of North American residency programs

被引:29
作者
Bofill, JA
Rust, OA
Perry, KG
Roberts, WE
Martin, RW
Morrison, JC
机构
[1] Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Univ. of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
[2] Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Univ. of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216-4505
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00208-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To document resident instruction in operative vaginal delivery by forceps and vacuum. Methods: A survey was sent to all 291 obstetrics-gynecology training programs in the United States and Canada. Results: The overall response rate was 72% (210 of 291). Most programs (60%) have an operative vaginal delivery rate of 10% or less. Nearly all of the responding programs (199 of 209, 95%) teach operative vaginal delivery via the vacuum route; metallic cups are used in only 14% of centers. Forceps are the primary instrument in most programs (68%), but nearly one-third of responding centers use the vacuum method mom often than forceps, instruction in midpelvic operative vaginal delivery is offered in 64% of the programs, with forceps being more common by nearly a two-to-one ratio. Deep transverse arrest is handled initially by forceps by half of the respondents, whereas 28 and 22% would proceed with cesarean or attempt a vacuum extraction, respectively. Conclusion: Instruction in both types of operative vaginal delivery is found in most programs. The forceps are used more commonly, but vacuum is the preferred instrument in about one-third of training programs. instruction in midpelvic delivery is offered in 64% of programs, but we noted a declining trend.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 625
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BERKUS MD, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P503
[2]  
BROEKHUIZEN FF, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P338
[3]   THE OBSTETRIC VACUUM EXTRACTOR IS THE INSTRUMENT OF 1ST CHOICE FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY [J].
CHALMERS, JA ;
CHALMERS, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05) :505-506
[4]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTETRICS, P555
[5]  
DELL DL, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P624
[6]   MIDFORCEPS DELIVERIES - LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF INFANTS [J].
DIERKER, LJ ;
ROSEN, MG ;
THOMPSON, K ;
LYNN, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 154 (04) :764-768
[7]  
HAGADORNFREATHY AS, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P356
[8]   SURVEY OF OBSTETRIC FORCEPS TRAINING IN NORTH-AMERICA IN 1981 [J].
HEALY, DL ;
LAUFE, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (01) :54-58
[9]   WORLDWIDE SURVEY OF ASSISTED VAGINAL DELIVERY [J].
HILLIER, CEM ;
JOHANSON, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1994, 47 (02) :109-114
[10]   NORTH-STAFFORDSHIRE WIGAN ASSISTED DELIVERY TRIAL [J].
JOHANSON, R ;
PUSEY, J ;
LIVERA, N ;
JONES, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05) :537-544