Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial

被引:5
作者
Harke, Nina Natascha [1 ]
Wagner, Christian [1 ]
Liakos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Urbanova, Katarina [1 ]
Addali, Mustapha [1 ]
Hadaschik, Boris A. [2 ]
Witt, Jorn H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Prostate Ctr Northwest, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Urol Oncol, Moellenweg 22, D-48599 Gronau, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Essen Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
关键词
Urethral catheter; Suprapubic tube; Early micturition; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; EARLY CATHETER REMOVAL; URINARY CONTINENCE; RECOVERY; DRAINAGE; OUTCOMES; PRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03225-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To elucidate early and long-term continence and patient comfort depending on type and duration of catheterization after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods 198 patients were randomized prospectively into three groups (May 2016-July 2017): A transurethral catheter with micturition on postoperative day (POD) 5 was placed in the control group (TD5); a suprapubic tube (SPT) with micturition on POD 5 was placed in the group SD5 or with micturition on POD 2 in group SD2, respectively. Questionnaires were used for catheter-related satisfaction. Functional outcome analysis included residual volume analysis, uroflowmetry, IPSS, 12-h pad test, and daily pad use. Follow-up was conducted up to 12 months. Results Postoperative comfort and catheter-related complications were similar in the three groups. However, on the day of catheter removal, continence was significantly better in the 12-h pad test for the SD2 group with 14 ml vs. 30 ml (TD5) and 24 ml (SD5), p = 0.007. Median residual urine volume between the groups was comparable with 17 ml in TD5, 7 ml in SD5, and 11 ml in SD2, (p = 0.07). Postoperative IPSS did not differ significantly in the follow-up period. After 4 weeks, 63% of the patients in SD2 were continent (no pad/day) compared to 33% in TD5 and 41% in SD5, p = 0.004. After 12 months, 76% were continent in TD5, 87% in SD5, and 94% in SD2, p = 0.023. Conclusions Early micturition after SPT placement in robotic radical prostatectomy seems to be beneficial without an increased risk of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 777
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Retzius space reconstruction following transperitoneal laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it have any added value? [J].
Abu-Ghanem Y. ;
Dotan Z. ;
Ramon J. ;
Zilberman D.E. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (3) :475-479
[2]   Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence [J].
Bertolo, Riccardo ;
Tracey, Andrew ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Micali, Salvatore ;
Bianchi, Giampaolo ;
Hampton, Lance ;
Tewari, Ash K. ;
Porpiglia, Francesco ;
Autorino, Riccardo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) :1365-1372
[3]   Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Donovan, J. L. ;
Hamdy, F. C. ;
Lane, J. A. ;
Mason, M. ;
Metcalfe, C. ;
Walsh, E. ;
Blazeby, J. M. ;
Peters, T. J. ;
Holding, P. ;
Bonnington, S. ;
Lennon, T. ;
Bradshaw, L. ;
Cooper, D. ;
Herbert, P. ;
Howson, J. ;
Jones, A. ;
Lyons, N. ;
Salter, E. ;
Thompson, P. ;
Tidball, S. ;
Blaikie, J. ;
Gray, C. ;
Bollina, P. ;
Catto, J. ;
Doble, A. ;
Doherty, A. ;
Gillatt, D. ;
Kockelbergh, R. ;
Kynaston, H. ;
Paul, A. ;
Powell, P. ;
Prescott, S. ;
Rosario, D. J. ;
Rowe, E. ;
Davis, M. ;
Turner, E. L. ;
Martin, R. M. ;
Neal, D. E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) :1425-1437
[4]   STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381
[5]   Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons [J].
Fossati, Nicola ;
Di Trapani, Ettore ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Dell'Oglio, Paolo ;
Umari, Paolo ;
Buffi, Nicolo Maria ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Mottrie, Alexander ;
Gaboardi, Franco ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Suardi, Nazareno .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) :872-877
[6]   Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study) [J].
Gratzke, Christian ;
Dovey, Zach ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Geurts, Nicolas ;
De Groote, Ruben ;
Schatteman, Peter ;
de Naeyer, Geert ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Mottrie, Alexandre .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (05) :917-923
[7]   Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial [J].
Harke, Nina ;
Godes, Michael ;
Habibzada, Jawid ;
Urbanova, Katarina ;
Wagner, Christian ;
Zecha, Henrik ;
Addali, Mustapha ;
Witt, Jorn H. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (03) :389-394
[8]   Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial [J].
Hurtes, Xavier ;
Roupret, Morgan ;
Vaessen, Christophe ;
Pereira, Helder ;
d'Arcier, Benjamin Faivre ;
Cormier, Luc ;
Bruyere, Franck .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (06) :875-883
[9]   Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Jian, Zhongyu ;
Feng, Shijian ;
Chen, Yuntian ;
Wei, Xin ;
Luo, Deyi ;
Li, Hong ;
Wang, Kunjie .
BMC UROLOGY, 2018, 18 :1
[10]   Impact of Percutaneous Suprapubic Tube Drainage on Patient Discomfort after Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Krane, Louis Spencer ;
Bhandari, Mahendra ;
Peabody, James O. ;
Menon, Mani .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (02) :325-330