Sensitivity of submersed freshwater macrophytes and endpoints in laboratory toxicity tests

被引:57
作者
Arts, Gertie H. P. [1 ]
Belgers, J. Dick M. [1 ]
Hoekzema, Conny H. [1 ]
Thissen, Jac T. N. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Ctr Water & Climate, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
submersed macrophytes; laboratory tests; endpoints; variability; sensitivity; non-axenic;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2007.07.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The toxicological sensitivity and variability of a range of macrophyte endpoints were statistically tested with data from chronic, non-axenic, macrophyte toxicity tests. Five submersed freshwater macrophytes, four pesticides/biocides and 13 endpoints were included in the statistical analyses. Root endpoints, reflecting root growth, were most sensitive in the toxicity tests, while endpoints relating to biomass, growth and shoot length were less sensitive. The endpoints with the lowest coefficients of variation were not necessarily the endpoints, which were toxicologically most sensitive. Differences in sensitivity were in the range of 10-1000 for different macrophyte-specific endpoints. No macrophyte species was consistently the most sensitive. Criteria to select endpoints in macrophyte toxicity tests should include toxicological sensitivity, variance and ecological relevance. Hence, macrophyte toxicity tests should comprise an array of endpoints, including very sensitive endpoints like those relating to root growth. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions [J].
Aldenberg, T ;
Jaworska, JS .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2000, 46 (01) :1-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
[3]   Ecological Impact in Ditch Mesocosms of Simulated Spray Drift from a Crop Protection Program for Potatoes [J].
Arts, Gertie H. P. ;
Buijse-Bogdan, Laura L. ;
Belgers, J. Dick M. ;
van Rhenen-Kersten, Caroline H. ;
van Wijngaarden, Rene P. A. ;
Roessink, Ivo ;
Maund, Steve J. ;
van den Brink, Paul J. ;
Brock, Theo C. M. .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (02) :105-125
[4]  
*ASTM, 2004, E191304 ASTM
[5]   SEDIMENT INTERACTIONS WITH SUBMERSED MACROPHYTE GROWTH AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICS [J].
BARKO, JW ;
GUNNISON, D ;
CARPENTER, SR .
AQUATIC BOTANY, 1991, 41 (1-3) :41-65
[6]   COMPARATIVE INFLUENCES OF LIGHT AND TEMPERATURE ON THE GROWTH AND METABOLISM OF SELECTED SUBMERSED FRESH-WATER MACROPHYTES [J].
BARKO, JW ;
SMART, RM .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1981, 51 (02) :219-235
[7]   Effects of the herbicide 294-D on the growth of nine aquatic macrophytes [J].
Belgers, J. Dick M. ;
Van Lieverloo, Ruud J. ;
Van der Pas, Leo J. T. ;
Van den Brink, Paul J. .
AQUATIC BOTANY, 2007, 86 (03) :260-268
[8]   Comparing aquatic risk assessment methods for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides metribuzin and metamitron [J].
Brock, TCM ;
Crum, SJH ;
Deneer, JW ;
Heimbach, F ;
Roijackers, RMM ;
Sinkeldam, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2004, 130 (03) :403-426
[9]   Environmental fate and effects of chlorothalonil: A Canadian perspective [J].
Caux, PY ;
Kent, RA ;
Fan, GT ;
Stephenson, GL .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 26 (01) :45-93
[10]   Does the effect of herbicide pulse exposure on aquatic plants depend on Kow or mode of action? [J].
Cedergreen, N ;
Andersen, L ;
Olesen, CF ;
Spliid, HH ;
Streibig, JC .
AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 71 (03) :261-271