Perforated marginal ulcer after gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review

被引:17
|
作者
Martinino, Alessandro [1 ,7 ]
Bhandari, Mayank [2 ]
Abouelazayem, Mohamed [3 ]
Abdellatif, Ayman [4 ]
Koshy, Renol M. [5 ]
Mahawar, Kamal [6 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Med & Dent, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp North Tees, Dept Gen Surg, Stockton on tees, England
[3] Royal Free London NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gen Surg, London, England
[4] Inverclyde Royal Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Greenock, Scotland
[5] Univ Hosp North Midlands, Dept Gen Surg, Stoke on trent, England
[6] Sunderland Royal Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Bariatr Unit, Sunderland, England
[7] Sapienza Univ Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
Marginal ulcer; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Perforation; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Mini gastric bypass; Single-anastomosis gastric bypass; Gastric bypass; RISK-FACTORS; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; COMPLICATIONS; PATIENT; SMOKING; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Marginal ulcers are a recognized complication of gastric bypass procedures for obesity. Perforated marginal ulcer (PMU) is a life-threatening complication of marginal ulcers. We performed a systematic review to understand the presentation, management, and outcomes of PMUs. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases were searched to identify all studies on PMUs after gastric bypass procedures. A total of 610 patients were identified from 26 articles. The mean age was 39.8 +/- 2.59 years, and females represented most of the cohort (67%). The mean body mass index was 43.2 +/- 5.67 kg/m2. Most of the patients had undergone a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (98%). The time gap between the primary bariatric surgery and the diagnosis of PMU was 27.5 +/- 8.56 months. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (99.5%) and a computed tomography scan was the diagnostic modality used in 72% of the patients. Only 15% of patients were on prophylactic proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers at the time of perforation, and 41% of patients were smoking at the time. Twenty-three percent of patients were on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Laparoscopic omental patch repair of the perforation (59%) was the most used technique; 18% of patients underwent open surgery, and 20% were managed non-surgically. Thirty-day mortality was 0.97%; it was 1.21% (n=5) and 0% (n=0) in those who were managed surgically and nonsurgically, respectively. Ulcers recurred in 5% of patients. In conclusion, PMU is a surgical emergency after gastric bypass that can result in significant morbidity and even mortality. This is the first systematic review in scientific literature characterizing this condition. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022;18:1168-1175.) (c) 2022 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1175
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beran, Azizullah
    Shaear, Mohammad
    Al-Mudares, Saif
    Sharma, Ishna
    Matar, Reem
    Al-Haddad, Mohammad
    Salame, Marita
    Portela, Ray
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (06) : 1066 - 1077
  • [2] Laparoscopic repair of a perforated marginal ulcer 2 years after gastric bypass
    E. H. Chin
    D. Hazzan
    U. Sarpel
    D. M. Herron
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 (11) : 2110 - 2110
  • [3] Predictors of marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azizullah Beran
    Mohammad Shaear
    Saif Al-Mudares
    Ishna Sharma
    Reem Matar
    Mohammad Al-Haddad
    Marita Salame
    Ray Portela
    Benjamin Clapp
    Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
    Omar M. Ghanem
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 1066 - 1077
  • [4] The natural history of perforated marginal ulcers after gastric bypass surgery
    Altieri, Maria S.
    Pryor, Aurora
    Yang, Jie
    Yin, Donglei
    Docimo, Salvatore
    Bates, Andrew
    Talamini, Mark
    Spaniolas, Konstantinos
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03): : 1215 - 1222
  • [5] Nonsurgical risk factors for marginal ulcer following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 cohort studies
    Liang, Yi
    Wang, Chunyun
    Yang, Lebin
    Yang, Kewei
    Zhang, Shulun
    Xie, Wenbiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (03) : 1793 - 1799
  • [6] Omental patch repair effectively treats perforated marginal ulcer following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Wendling, Mark R.
    Linn, John G.
    Keplinger, Kara M.
    Mikami, Dean J.
    Perry, Kyle A.
    Melvin, W. Scott
    Needleman, Bradley J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (02): : 384 - 389
  • [7] Phlegmon Formation due to Perforated Marginal Ulcer After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass; Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Video Case Report
    Daryabari, Seyed Nooredin
    Maleknia, Seyed Adel
    Meimand, Faridadin Ebrahimi
    Pazouki, Abdolreza
    Kermansaravi, Mohammad
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (11) : 5102 - 5103
  • [8] Phlegmon Formation due to Perforated Marginal Ulcer After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass; Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Video Case Report
    Seyed Nooredin Daryabari
    Seyed Adel Maleknia
    Faridadin Ebrahimi Meimand
    Abdolreza Pazouki
    Mohammad Kermansaravi
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 5102 - 5103
  • [9] Repair of a Perforated Marginal Ulcer Seven Years After Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass: A Case Report and Review of Literature
    Brito, Yesenia
    Kayode, Omobolanle
    Peters, Dominique
    Nair, Ameya
    James, Melyssa
    Tiesenga, Frederick
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [10] Marginal Ulcer Perforation After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Case Report and Literature Review
    Kolyadko, Pavel Vasil'evich
    Kolyadko, Vasily Pavlovich
    Degovtsov, Evgeniy Nikolaevich
    Satinov, Vladimir Alekseevich
    Samoylov, Vladimir Sergeevich
    Stepanenko, Artem Vladimirovich
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 86 (SUPPL3) : 664 - 668