Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace

被引:48
作者
Cundiff, Jessica L. [1 ]
Vescio, Theresa K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol Sci, Humanities & Social Sci 136, 500 W 14th St, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Stereotyped attitudes; Sex role attitudes; Attribution; Division of labor; Sex discrimination; PSYCHOLOGICAL ESSENTIALISM; PERSONAL DISCRIMINATION; SOCIAL ATTRIBUTION; IMPLICIT THEORIES; PERCEPTIONS; FEMALE; WOMEN; RACE; SEX; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Gender stereotypes provide viable explanations for why women are underrepresented and men are overrepresented in senior leadership positions and STEM occupations, typically by attributing gender disparities to the dispositions of women and men. The present research examined whether stereotypes also influence attributions to discrimination. Consistent with predictions, undergraduate participants who strongly vs. weakly endorsed gender stereotypes, either chronically (Study 1, N = 147) or when situationally primed (Study 2, N = 258), were less likely to attribute gender disparities in the workplace to discrimination. In addition, participants unexpectedly made stronger discrimination attributions when explaining gender gaps in leadership positions than in STEM occupations, suggesting that interventions for addressing gender discrimination may need to use different strategies for different contexts. Overall, results are consistent with the notion that stereotypes influence explanations for group disparities in ways that justify existing social arrangements as fair, just, and legitimate. Our findings have implications for understanding when people will acknowledge discrimination, which is an important first step toward addressing discrimination.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 138
页数:13
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, JUDGMENTS RESPONSIBI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, United States Department of Labor Good for Business: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital: The Environmental Scan: A Fact-Finding Report of the Federal Glass Ceiling Commission
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139175043
[5]  
Barreto M., 2009, The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality
[6]   Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement [J].
Bastian, B ;
Haslam, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (02) :228-235
[7]  
Bell M.P., 1997, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, V33, P356, DOI DOI 10.1177/0021886397333006
[8]   Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups [J].
Biernat, M ;
Kobrynowicz, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (03) :544-557
[9]  
BIERNAT M, 2004, J SOCIAL ISSUES, V60
[10]   Skirting the Issues: Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in IPO Prospectus Evaluations [J].
Bigelow, Lyda ;
Lundmark, Leif ;
Parks, Judi McLean ;
Wuebker, Robert .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (06) :1732-1759