Attacking your partners: Strategic alliances and competition between partners in product markets

被引:125
作者
Cui, Victor [1 ]
Yang, Haibin [2 ]
Vertinsky, Ilan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Asper Sch Business, Dept Business Adm, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Dept Mkt Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sauder Sch Business, Strategy & Business Econ Div, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
alliance; alliance learning; network embeddedness; partner competition; product market; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; STRUCTURAL HOLES; TRUST MATTER; NETWORKS; EXPLOITATION; EMBEDDEDNESS; EXPLORATION; PERFORMANCE; RIVALRY; COOPERATION;
D O I
10.1002/smj.2746
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study contributes to the literature on strategic alliances by examining the impact of collaboration on competition between partners in product markets. We integrate the alliance learning and social network perspectives to examine how different combinations of exploratory and exploitative alliances between a firm and its partner influence the firm's competition against its partner in product markets. Using a longitudinal dataset collected in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry (1984-2003), we find an inverted U-shaped relationship between relative exploration (i.e., the proportion of exploratory alliances in the collaborative portfolio between a firm and its partner) and the firm's competition against its partner. This relationship is negatively moderated by firms' relational and structural embeddedness, but positively moderated by their positional embeddedness. This study examines how different combinations of exploratory and exploitative alliances between two firms affect their competition in the product market. Using a 20-year dataset collected in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, we find that the proportion of exploratory alliances (i.e., joint development of critical innovations) in the alliance portfolio between a firm and its partner increases the firm's competition against its partner, up to a tipping point at which such competition starts to decline. Given a certain combination of the two types of alliances, such competition is stronger if the firm has more alternative allies than its partner but weaker if the firm and its partner have previously collaborated or share common allies in their networks.
引用
收藏
页码:3116 / 3139
页数:24
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge [J].
Agrawal, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (01) :63-79
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   STRUCTURAL HOMOPHILY OR SOCIAL ASYMMETRY? THE FORMATION OF ALLIANCES BY POORLY EMBEDDED FIRMS [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Polidoro, Francisco, Jr. ;
Mitchell, Will .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (09) :941-958
[4]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[5]   Alliance Portfolio Configurations and Competitive Action Frequency [J].
Andrevski, Goce ;
Brass, Daniel J. ;
Ferrier, Walter J. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 42 (04) :811-837
[6]   Competitive intensity and collaboration: Impact on firm growth across technological environments [J].
Ang, Siah Hwee .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (10) :1057-1075
[7]   Disentangling the influences of leaders' relational embeddedness on interorganizational exchange [J].
Barden, Jeffrey Q. ;
Mitchell, Will .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (06) :1440-1461
[8]  
Belsley D.A., 2005, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
[9]  
Borgatti S.P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2009.01613.X, 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01613.x]
[10]  
Brass D.J., 1992, RES POLITICS SOC, VVol. 4, P295