Measuring disability in nursing home residents: Validity and reliability of a newly developed instrument

被引:6
作者
Valk, M
Post, MWM
Cools, HJM
Schrijvers, GAJP
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Med, Julius Ctr Gen Practice & Patient Oriented Res, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Nursing Home Med, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2001年 / 56卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/geronb/56.3.P187
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
A 24-item multidimensional nurse-administered Nursing Home Disabilities Instrument (NHDI) was developed to measure disabilities in nursing home residents. We present the psychometric features and value of this instrument, with the following domains assessed: Mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Alertness, Resistance to Nursing Assistance, Incontinence, Cognition, and Perception. Test-retest and interrater reliability was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was examined by Cronbach's alpha. Criterion validity tests were performed by comparing the scales with scales of the Elderly Residents Rating Scale (BOP). Test-retest reliability correlation coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 0.94. Interrater reliability was high for the scales Cognition, Mobility, ADL, and Incontinence (0.79 to 0.93), moderate for Resistance (0.51), and low for Perception (0.33). Cronbach's alpha of the scales was high, ranging from 0.78 (Alertness) to 0.93 (Mobility); only Perception showed a low alpha: 0.54, Criterion validity was high for Cognition, ADL, and Mobility (0.75 to 0.78), and moderate for Alertness (0.59). The NHDI appears to be a valid and efficient multidimensional instrument for measuring disabilities in nursing home residents. These findings imply that the NHDI is a useful instrument for nursing homes to achieve a reliable assessment of cognitively impaired elders.
引用
收藏
页码:P187 / P191
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, HANDLEIDING GIP GEDR
[2]  
BERGNER M, 1987, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V8, P191, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.8.1.191
[3]   DEVELOPING MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH INDEXES [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
TORRANCE, GW .
MEDICAL CARE, 1984, 22 (11) :1045-1057
[4]   THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGIC FACTORS ON MEASUREMENT OF FUNCTIONAL STATUS - ASSESSMENT OF THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE [J].
BROOKS, WB ;
JORDAN, JS ;
DIVINE, GW ;
SMITH, KS ;
NEELON, FA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (09) :793-804
[5]   Psychometric characteristics of the Minimum Data Set I: Confirmatory factor analysis [J].
Casten, R ;
Lawton, MP ;
Parmelee, PA ;
Kleban, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (06) :726-735
[6]  
Dautzenberg P L, 1991, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V135, P850
[7]  
de Jonghe J F, 1994, Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, V25, P110
[8]  
de Jonghe J F, 1996, Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, V27, P159
[9]  
DEGRAAF A, 1992, COGNITIVE SCREENING
[10]  
Diesfeldt H F, 1981, Gerontologie, V12, P139