PI vs fractional PI for the control of a shunt active power filter

被引:0
作者
Rico, A. [1 ]
Milanes, M. I. [1 ]
Romero, E. [1 ]
Vinagre, B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Dept Elect Elect & Control Engn, Sch Ind Engn, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 5, PTS A-C, | 2008年
关键词
Shunt Active Power Filter; Unity Power Factor; Voltage Synchronization; PI controller; Fractional Order Control;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Nonlinear loads connected to electric power systems lead to distortions in the source current waveform. One solution to improve power quality is the use of Shunt Active Power Filters (SAPF), which are able to correct both the harmonics and the unbalance in the load current. Two of the most commonly used control strategies for these devices are the so-called Unity Power Factor (UPF) strategy and the Voltage Synchronization (VS) strategy. In these, the reference currents are obtained by multiplying the source voltages by the equivalent conductance. In VS strategy this conductance is obtained from the tracking error between the measured dc bus voltage and a reference value. To minimize this tracking error, linear controller structures, as PI are used. In the last three decades, Fractional Order Control (FOC) has been used in many robust control problems, and has been applied recently to the control of a Power Electronic Buck Converter. In this line, we here consider the use of a fractional PI controller to obtain the reference current in a SAPF under the VS strategy. Simulation results are given comparing the PI and Fractional PI controllers in order to minimize the ISE and IAE cost functions of the tracking error. They show the improved performance obtained with the PI fractional controller.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1266
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A modified switching signal generation technique to minimize the RMS tracking error in active filters [J].
Cadaval, ER ;
Montero, MIM ;
González, FB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2005, 20 (05) :1118-1124
[2]  
CALDERON AJ, 2006, FRACTIONAL CONTROL P
[3]   COMPENSATION STRATEGIES FOR SHUNT ACTIVE-FILTER CONTROL [J].
CAVALLINI, A ;
MONTANARI, GC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 1994, 9 (06) :587-593
[4]   An improved control algorithm of shunt active filter for voltage regulation, harmonic elimination, power-factor correction, and balancing of nonlinear loads [J].
Chandra, A ;
Singh, B ;
Singh, BN ;
Al-Haddad, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2000, 15 (03) :495-507
[5]   An instantaneous reactive volt-ampere compensator and harmonic suppressor system [J].
Chatterjee, K ;
Fernandes, BG ;
Dubey, GK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 1999, 14 (02) :381-392
[6]   Control of a new active power filter using 3-D vector control [J].
Dastfan, A ;
Gosbell, VJ ;
Platt, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2000, 15 (01) :5-12
[7]   A control algorithm for compensation of customer-generated harmonics and reactive power [J].
Jain, SK ;
Agarwal, P ;
Gupta, HO .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2004, 19 (01) :357-366
[8]  
LEMEHAUTE A, 2005, FRACTIONAL DERIVATES
[9]   Comparison of control strategies for shunt active power filters in three-phase four-wire systems [J].
Milanes Montero, Maria Isabel ;
Romero Cadaval, Enrique ;
Barrero Gonzalez, Fermin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2007, 22 (01) :229-236
[10]   On fractional PIλ controllers:: Some tuning rules for robustness to plant uncertainties [J].
Monje, CA ;
Calderon, AJ ;
Vinagre, BM ;
Chen, YQ ;
Feliu, V .
NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2004, 38 (1-4) :369-381