Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption

被引:36
作者
Hakim, Nicole [1 ]
Feldmann-Wustefeld, Tobias [2 ]
Awh, Edward [1 ]
Vogel, Edward K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, 940 East 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
CONTRALATERAL DELAY ACTIVITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE; DISTRACTION; MECHANISMS; AREA; SET;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_01481
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Working memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. Across two experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded EEG activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity and lateralized alpha power (8-12 Hz). After interruption, we found that contralateral delay activity amplitude momentarily sustained but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information and that brief irrelevant onsets disrupt two distinct online aspects of working memory. In addition, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain's response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 569
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   The Contribution of Attentional Lapses to Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity [J].
Adam, Kirsten C. S. ;
Mance, Irida ;
Fukuda, Keisuke ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 27 (08) :1601-1616
[2]  
Andrews A., 2009, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V53, P409, DOI DOI 10.1177/154193120905300451
[3]   Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention [J].
Bisley, JW ;
Goldberg, ME .
SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5603) :81-86
[4]   Activity of neurons in cortical area MT during a memory for motion task [J].
Bisley, JW ;
Zaksas, D ;
Droll, JA ;
Pasternak, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 91 (01) :286-300
[5]   Interactions between attention and memory [J].
Chun, Marvin M. ;
Turk-Browne, Nicholas B. .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) :177-184
[6]   Mechanisms of Working Memory Disruption by External Interference [J].
Clapp, Wesley C. ;
Rubens, Michael T. ;
Gazzaley, Adam .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2010, 20 (04) :859-872
[8]   The role of working memory in visual selective attention [J].
de Fockert, JW ;
Rees, G ;
Frith, CD ;
Lavie, N .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5509) :1803-1806
[9]   Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention [J].
Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias ;
Vogel, Edward K. ;
Awh, Edward .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 30 (08) :1185-1196
[10]   Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement [J].
Feldmann-Wuestefeld, Tobias ;
Schuboe, Anna .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03)