Enhancing semantic consistency in anti-fraud rule-based expert systems

被引:15
作者
del Mar Roldan-Garcia, Maria [1 ]
Garcia-Nieto, Jose [1 ]
Aldana-Montes, Jose F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Dept Lenguajes & Ciencias Computac, ETSI Informat, Campus Teatinos, Malaga 29071, Spain
关键词
Semantic model; Ontology reasoning; Rule-based expert system; Fraud detection expert systems; OWL; ONTOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.036
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this study, an ontology-driven approach is proposed for semantic conflict detection and classification in rule-based expert systems. It focuses on the critical case of anti-fraud rule repositories for the inspection of Card Not Present (CNP) transactions in e-commerce environments. The main motivation is to examine and curate anti-fraud rule datasets to avoid semantic conflicts that could lead the underpinning expert system to incorrectly perform, e.g., by accepting fraudulent transactions and/or by discarding harmless ones. The proposed approach is based" on Web Ontology Language (OWL) and Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) technologies to develop an anti-fraud rule ontology and reasoning tasks, respectively. The three main contributions of this work are: first, the creation of a conceptual knowledge model for describing anti-fraud rules and their relationships; second, the development of semantic rules as conflict resolution methods for anti-fraud expert systems; third, experimental facts are gathered to evaluate and validate the proposed model. A real-world use case In the e-cotnmerce (e-Tourlsm) Industry Is used to explain the ontological knowledge design and its use. The experiments show that ontological approaches can effectively discover and classify conflicts in rule-based expert systems in the field of anti-fraud applications. The proposal is also applicable to other domains where knowledge rule bases are involved. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 343
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Alexopoulos P, 2007, ICE-B 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, P269
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems
[3]  
Bo Hu, 2013, Semantic Technology. Second Joint International Conference, JIST 2012. Proceedings: LNCS 7774, P319
[4]  
Dean M., 2004, TECHNICAL REPORT
[5]  
Durkin J., 1998, EXPERT SYSTEMS DESIG
[6]  
Fang L, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4489, P1048
[7]  
Gomez-Perez A., 2004, ONTOLOGICAL ENG
[8]   SweetDeal: Representing agent contracts with exceptions using Semantic Web rules, ontologies, and process descriptions [J].
Grosof, BN ;
Poon, TC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2004, 8 (04) :61-97
[9]  
Gross C, 2011, BASIN FUTURES: WATER REFORM IN THE MURRAY-DARLING BASIN, P149
[10]   A TRANSLATION APPROACH TO PORTABLE ONTOLOGY SPECIFICATIONS [J].
GRUBER, TR .
KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, 1993, 5 (02) :199-220