Can a difference in chest wall mechanics explain the lower respiratory drive during propofol versus halothane anesthesia in children?

被引:0
作者
Brown, K [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Anaesthesia, Montreal Childrens Hosp, Montreal, PQ H3H 1P3, Canada
关键词
pediatric anesthesia; halothane; propofol; respiratory drive; respiratory inductive plethysmography;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199809)26:3<183::AID-PPUL5>3.3.CO;2-J
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
This article extends previous work which suggested that respiratory drive was lower during propofol compared with halothane anesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess simultaneously chest wall motion, measured with respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP), and respiratory drive measured by P-0.1, the pressure generated during the initial 100 msec of an occluded inspiratory effort. Ten healthy children age 3 to 6 years who presented for a denial restorative procedure that required in excess of 2.5 hours were recruited. Patients were anesthetized with propofol (2.5 mg.kg(-1); 15 mg.kg(-1).hr) or halothane (1.25%), in a randomized crossover study design. Following induction of anesthesia, RIP bands were placed at the level of the nipples and the umbilicus for the measurement of rib cage and abdomen excursion, respectively. Flow and airway pressure were measured. A manually operated pneumatic balloon was used for brief airway occlusion. Following a 60-minute washin/out of the anesthetic, the children were removed from mechanical ventilation and spontaneous ventilation was reinstated. The RIP signals were calibrated by the method of simultaneous solution of equations. The phase lag was calculated. During airway occlusion the maxima! excursion of the calibrated rib cage trace (R-MAX) was measured; a negative value indicated retraction of the rib cage. Respiratory drive was assessed both at a fixed interval (100 msec) (P-0.1) and fixed proportion (10%) (P-10%) of the occluded inspiratory effort. Significance of differences were assessed with a paired t-test (P-value < 0.05). Thoracoabdominal asynchrony was greater during halothane than propofol anesthesia, as was the amount of rib cage retraction, evidenced by lower values of R-MAX; respiratory drive was higher during halothane than propofol anesthesia, as evidenced by higher values of both P-0.1 and P-10%. We conclude that during halothane anesthesia altered chest wall mechanics may result in a greater respiratory drive than during propofol anesthesia. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Allen JL, 1996, INFANT RESP FUNCTION, P329
[2]  
Armitage P, 1987, Statistical methods in medical research, V2nd
[3]   INFLUENCE OF CHEST WALL ON RESPIRATORY RATE AND DEPTH [J].
BLAND, S ;
LAZEROU, L ;
DYCK, G ;
CHERNIACK, RM .
RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1967, 3 (01) :47-+
[4]   The Hering-Breuer reflex in anesthetized infants: end-inspiratory vs. end-expiratory occlusion technique [J].
Brown, K ;
Stocks, J ;
Aun, C ;
Rabbette, PS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 84 (04) :1437-1446
[5]   CHEST-WALL MOTION DURING HALOTHANE ANESTHESIA IN INFANTS AND YOUNG-CHILDREN [J].
BROWN, KA ;
BISSONNETTE, B ;
HOLTBY, H ;
SHANDLING, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1992, 39 (01) :21-26
[6]   USE OF AIRWAY OCCLUSION IN INFANTS [J].
BRYAN, AC ;
BRYAN, MH ;
KIRKPATRICK, SML ;
KNILL, RL .
CHEST, 1976, 70 (01) :142-145
[7]   EFFECTS OF HALOTHANE AND ISOFLURANE ON VENTILATION AND OCCLUSION PRESSURE [J].
CANET, J ;
SANCHIS, J ;
ZEGRI, A ;
LLORENTE, C ;
NAVAJAS, D ;
CASAN, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (03) :563-571
[8]  
DERRENE JP, 1976, J APPL PHYSIOL, V40, P805
[9]  
DUFFTY P, 1981, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V123, P542
[10]   REDUCED LUNG-VOLUME DURING BEHAVIORAL ACTIVE SLEEP IN THE NEWBORN [J].
HENDERSONSMART, DJ ;
READ, DJC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 46 (06) :1081-1085