A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes

被引:38
作者
Sarmini, OR [1 ]
Lefholz, K [1 ]
Froeschke, HP [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Arlington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Arlington, TX USA
关键词
abdominal hysterectomy; supracervical hysterectomy; complications of hysterectomy; recovery from hysterectomy; outpatient hysterectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare operative and postoperative results of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). DESIGN: Cohort retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Department of gynecology at a metropolitan medical center. PATIENTS: Two hundred-twenty women who underwent LSH with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Two hundred-twenty women who underwent TAH with or without BSO. Both groups had similar surgical indications and final pathology. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women who underwent LSH had a shorter operating time than those in the TAH group (47.7 +/- 14.6 min vs 74.9 +/- 25.6 min). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LSH group, and those patients returned to work sooner. The operative complication rate 47 was higher in the TAH group (2.7% vs 0.9%). Postoperative complication rate for the TAH group was higher than the LSH group (25% vs zero). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is a safe and effective surgical treatment for patients in need of a hysterectomy with or without BSO. The procedure can be performed in an outpatient setting. Patients experience a much quicker recovery than those who undergo TAH, and the complication rate is significantly lower. (c) 2005 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 124
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] CHUNGCHAN S, 2003, J AM ASSOC GYN LAP, V10, P147
  • [2] Advantages of laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy
    Ewen, SP
    Sutton, CJG
    [J]. BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 9 (04): : 707 - 715
  • [3] Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997
    Farquhar, CM
    Steiner, CA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [4] Supracervical versus total hysterectomy
    Johns, A
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04) : 903 - 913
  • [5] Keshavarz Homa, 2002, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V51, P1
  • [6] Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications
    Kovac, SR
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) : 787 - 793
  • [7] LALONDE CJ, 1996, CLIN OBSTET GYNECOL, V3, P251
  • [8] A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: Surgical complications and clinical outcomes
    Learman, LA
    Summitt, RL
    Varner, RE
    McNeeley, SG
    Goodman-Gruen, D
    Richter, HE
    Lin, F
    Showstack, J
    Ireland, CC
    Vittighoff, E
    Hulley, SB
    Washington, AE
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (03) : 453 - 462
  • [9] Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
    Lyons, TL
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (02) : 441 - +
  • [10] A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy
    Milad, MP
    Morrison, K
    Sokol, A
    Miller, D
    Kirkpatrick, L
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (03): : 286 - 288