Comparison of intensity modulated x-ray therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy for selective subvolume boosting: a phantom study

被引:41
作者
Flynn, R. T.
Barbee, D. L.
Mackie, T. R.
Jeraj, R.
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53703 USA
[2] TomoTherapy Inc, Madison, WI 53717 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Selective subvolume boosting can theoretically improve tumour control probability while maintaining normal tissue complication probabilities similar to those of uniform dose distributions. In this work the abilities of intensity-modulated x-ray therapy ( IMXT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy ( IMPT) to deliver boosts to multiple subvolumes of varying size and proximities are compared in a thorough phantom study. IMXT plans were created using the step-and-shoot ( IMXT-SAS) and helical tomotherapy ( IMXT- HT) methods. IMPT plans were created with the spot scanning ( IMPT-SS) and distal gradient tracking ( IMPT-DGT) methods. IMPT-DGT is a generalization of the distal edge tracking method designed to reduce the number of proton beam spots required to deliver non-uniform dose distributions relative to IMPT-SS. The IMPT methods were delivered over both 180 degrees and 360 degrees arcs. The IMXT-SAS and IMPT-SS methods optimally satisfied the non-uniform dose prescriptions the least and the most, respectively. The IMPT delivery methods reduced the normal tissue integral dose by a factor of about 2 relative to the IMXT delivery methods, regardless of the delivery arc. The IMPT-DGT method reduced the number of proton beam spots by a factor of about 3 relative to the IMPT-SS method.
引用
收藏
页码:6073 / 6091
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   On biologically conformal boost dose optimization [J].
Alber, M ;
Paulsen, F ;
Eschmann, SM ;
Machulla, HJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (02) :N31-N35
[2]   Integral radiation dose to normal structures with conformal external beam radiation [J].
Aoyama, H ;
Westerly, DC ;
Mackie, TR ;
Olivera, GH ;
Bentzen, SM ;
Patel, RR ;
Jaradat, H ;
Tome, WA ;
Ritter, MA ;
Mehta, MP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (03) :962-967
[3]   Simultaneous infield boost with helical tomotherapy for patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases [J].
Bauman, Glenn ;
Yartsev, Slav ;
Fisher, Barb ;
Kron, Tomas ;
Laperriere, Normand ;
Heydarian, Mostafa ;
VanDyk, Jake .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 30 (01) :38-44
[4]   Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers [J].
Bentzen, SM .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) :112-117
[5]   OPTIMIZATION OF BEAM ORIENTATIONS IN RADIATION-THERAPY - SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BORTFELD, T ;
SCHLEGEL, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (02) :291-304
[6]   X-RAY FIELD COMPENSATION WITH MULTILEAF COLLIMATORS [J].
BORTFELD, TR ;
KAHLER, DL ;
WALDRON, TJ ;
BOYER, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (03) :723-730
[7]   OPTIMAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION FOR ERADICATION OF HETEROGENEOUS TUMORS [J].
BRAHME, A ;
AGREN, AK .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1987, 26 (05) :377-385
[8]   Optimum beam configurations in tomographic intensity modulated radiation therapy [J].
Braunstein, M ;
Levine, RY .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (02) :305-328
[9]   A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Bosch, WR ;
Mutic, S ;
Lewis, JS ;
Dehdashti, F ;
Mintun, MA ;
Dempsey, JF ;
Perez, CA ;
Purdy, JA ;
Welch, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04) :1171-1182
[10]   Development of an inverse optimization package to plan nonuniform dose distributions based on spatially inhomogeneous radiosensitivity extracted from biological images [J].
Chen, Guang-Pei ;
Ahunbay, Ergun ;
Schultz, Christopher ;
Li, X. Allen .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1198-1205