Demystifying Content Analysis

被引:495
作者
Kleinheksel, A. J. [1 ]
Rockich-Winston, Nicole [1 ]
Tawfik, Huda [2 ]
Wyatt, Tasha R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, 1120 15th St,GB 3353, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Cent Michigan Univ, Coll Med, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
content analysis; educational research; latent; manifest; qualitative data analysis; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.5688/ajpe7113
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective. In the course of daily teaching responsibilities, pharmacy educators collect rich data that can provide valuable insight into student learning. This article describes the qualitative data analysis method of content analysis, which can be useful to pharmacy educators because of its application in the investigation of a wide variety of data sources, including textual, visual, and audio files. Findings. Both manifest and latent content analysis approaches are described, with several examples used to illustrate the processes. This article also offers insights into the variety of relevant terms and visualizations found in the content analysis literature. Finally, common threats to the reliability and validity of content analysis are discussed, along with suitable strategies to mitigate these risks during analysis. Summary. This review of content analysis as a qualitative data analysis method will provide clarity and actionable instruction for both novice and experienced pharmacy education researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 137
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1966, Clientcentered therapy
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AM J PHARM EDUC
[3]   Beginning an assessment project: A case study using data audit and content analysis [J].
Bird, E ;
Anderson, HM ;
Anaya, G ;
Moore, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 69 (03) :356-369
[4]  
Erlingsson C, 2017, AFR J EMERG MED, V7, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
[5]   Students' motivations for class attendance [J].
Fjortoft, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 69 (01) :107-112
[6]   Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness [J].
Graneheim, UH ;
Lundman, B .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) :105-112
[7]   Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper [J].
Graneheim, Ulla H. ;
Lindgren, Britt-Marie ;
Lundman, Bent .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 56 :29-34
[8]  
Guba EG., 1981, Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches
[9]   A Standardized Patient Counseling Rubric for a Pharmaceutical Care and Communications Course [J].
Horton, Niambi ;
Payne, Kenna D. ;
Jernigan, Michelle ;
Frost, Jill ;
Wise, Stephen ;
Klein, Mary ;
Epps, Joel ;
Anderson, H. Glenn .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 77 (07)
[10]   Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J].
Hsieh, HF ;
Shannon, SE .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) :1277-1288