共 25 条
Identifying cyber insecurities in trustworthy space and energy sector for smart grids
被引:19
作者:
Priyadarshini, Ishaani
[1
]
Kumar, Raghvendra
[2
]
Sharma, Rohit
[3
]
Singh, Pradeep Kumar
[4
]
Satapathy, Suresh Chandra
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Newark, DE USA
[2] GIET Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Gunupur, India
[3] SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Fac Engn & Technol, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, NCR Campus,Delhi NCR Campus,Delhi Meerut Rd, Ghaziabad, UP, India
[4] ABES Engn Coll, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
[5] KIIT Deemed Univ, Sch Comp Engn, Bhubaneswar, India
关键词:
Energy sector;
Trustworthy Space;
Analytic Hierarchy Process;
Multi-Criteria Decision Making tool;
Cyber Insecurities;
Smart Grid;
Cyber Attacks;
SECURITY;
FRAMEWORK;
NETWORKS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107204
中图分类号:
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号:
0812 ;
摘要:
Energy is critical infrastructure, and addressing cybersecurity issues in the energy sector is challenging. Cloud computing has advanced from being a data storage solution to a complex system that enables resource management, workforce management, scalability, flexibility, managing operational expenses, etc. The energies sector relies heavily on critical infrastructure and cloud usage. Hence, there is a simultaneous increase in the insecurities prevailing in both environments. Smart grids are vulnerable to cyber insecurities due to immense networking and data delivery. In this paper, we propose some of these insecurities that prevail in the cloud computing environment (Trustworthy Space) and the energy sector for smart grids. The insecurities are classified based on the motivation behind them. We rely on the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine how these insecurities affect smart grids. As AHP exhibits priority, we can successfully verify the contributory insecurity for every classification.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文