Aggregated colon cancer cells have a higher metastatic efficiency in the liver compared with nonaggregated cells: An experimental study

被引:24
作者
Topal, B
Roskams, T
Fevery, J
Penninckx, F
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Abdominal Surg, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Histopathol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Hepatol, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
liver metastases; colorectal cancer; animal;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00140-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. It remains unclear whether aggregated colon cancer cells have a higher tendency for metastasis formation than nonaggregated cells. Also, the absolute number of cancer cells required for hepatic metastasis remains undefined. The aim of the present study was to compare in the liver the metastatic efficiency of viable nonaggregated colon cancer cells versus cell aggregates for equivalent numbers of cancer cells. Materials and methods. DHD/K12/TRb colon cancer cells were administered through the portal vein in syngeneic male BD IX rats. Surgical exploration was performed 8 weeks after injection. Four groups of rats were injected with 0.25 or 0.5 X 10(6) DHD/K12/TRb viable cancer cells, either as single nonaggregated cells or as cell aggregates. Results. Hepatic metastases were observed in 81% of the rats after intraportal injection of cell aggregates equivalent to 0.5 X 10(6) cancer cells. A significant lower metastatic efficiency was found after the injection of 0.5 x 10(6) non-aggregated, and 0.25 x 10(6) aggregated or nonaggregated cancer cells i.e., 16%, 32%, and 27%, respectively. Conclusion. Aggregated colon cancer cells have a higher metastatic efficiency in the liver compared with non-aggregated cells, although a critical number of cancer cells are necessary. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   CANCER-CELL TRAFFIC IN THE LIVER .1. GROWTH-KINETICS OF CANCER-CELLS AFTER PORTAL-VEIN DELIVERY [J].
BARBERAGUILLEM, E ;
SMITH, I ;
WEISS, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 52 (06) :974-977
[2]  
BUTLER TP, 1975, CANCER RES, V35, P512
[3]   SPECIFICITY OF THE IMMUNE-RESPONSE LEADING TO PROTECTION OR ENHANCEMENT BY REGRESSIVE AND PROGRESSIVE VARIANTS OF A RAT COLON-CARCINOMA [J].
CAIGNARD, A ;
PELLETIER, H ;
MARTIN, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1988, 42 (06) :883-886
[4]  
CHADENEAU C, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P15601
[5]   OVER-EXPRESSION OF THE S13 RIBOSOMAL-PROTEIN IN ACTIVELY GROWING CELLS [J].
DENIS, MG ;
CHADENEAU, C ;
LECABELLEC, MT ;
LEMOULLAC, B ;
LEMEVEL, B ;
MEFLAH, K ;
LUSTENBERGER, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 55 (02) :275-280
[6]   CHARACTERIZATION OF AN ANIMAL-MODEL OF METASTATIC COLON-CARCINOMA [J].
DUNNINGTON, DJ ;
BUSCARINO, C ;
GENNARO, D ;
GREIG, R ;
POSTE, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 39 (02) :248-254
[7]  
FIDLER IJ, 1973, EUR J CANCER, V9, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0014-2964(73)80022-2
[8]   EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THE DORMANT TUMOR CELL [J].
FISHER, B ;
FISHER, ER .
SCIENCE, 1959, 130 (3380) :918-919
[9]  
FISHER ER, 1965, ACTA CYTOL, V9, P146
[10]  
LIOTTA LA, 1974, CANCER RES, V34, P977