Variability in electrodiagnostic findings associated with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

被引:16
作者
Mul, Karlien [1 ]
Pesser, Niels [2 ,3 ]
Vervaart, Kimberly [4 ]
Teijink, Joep [2 ,3 ]
van Nuenen, Bart [4 ]
van Alfen, Nens [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Res Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Neurol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
brachial plexopathy; clinical neurophysiology; electrodiagnostic studies; nerve ultrasound; neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome; HUMAN CERVICAL MYOTOMES; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/mus.27395
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction/Aims Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is a heterogeneous and often disputed entity. An electrodiagnostic pattern of T1 > C8 axon involvement is considered characteristic for the diagnosis of NTOS. However, since the advent of high-resolution nerve ultrasound (US) imaging, we have encountered several patients with a proven entrapment of the lower brachial plexus who showed a different, variable electrodiagnostic pattern. Methods In this retrospective case series, 14 patients with an NTOS diagnosis with a verified source of compression of the lower brachial plexus and abnormal findings on their electrodiagnostic testing were included. Their medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical, imaging, and electrodiagnostic data. Results Seven patients showed results consistent with the "classic" T1 axon > C8 pattern of involvement. Less typical findings included equally severe involvement of T1 and C8 axons, more severe C8 involvement, pure motor abnormalities, neurogenic changes on needle electromyography in the flexor carpi radialis and biceps brachii muscles, and one patient with an abnormal sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude for the median sensory response recorded from the third digit. Patients with atypical findings on electrodiagnostic testing underwent nerve imaging more often compared to patients with classic findings (seven of seven patients vs. five of seven respectively), especially nerve ultrasound. Discussion When there is a clinical suspicion of NTOS, an electrodiagnostic finding other than the classic T1 > C8 pattern of involvement does not rule out the diagnosis. High resolution nerve imaging is valuable to diagnose additional patients with this treatable condition.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条